Dallas Approves $650,000 Settlement for 'Exxxotica' Free Speech Case
The $650,000 comes from the city's risk management fund and is meant to pay Three Expo, its attorney Roger Albright and anyone else with an interest in the case, said the city's settlement resolution.
June 12, 2019 at 04:40 PM
3 minute read
The Dallas City Council has approved a $650,000 settlement to end a First Amendment lawsuit by an adult entertainment company that alleged the city violated its constitutional rights by barring it's “Exxxotica” event from the Dallas Convention Center in 2016.
Without debate, council members voted unanimously Wednesday to approve the settlement with Three Expo Events in the case pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas in Dallas. Most discussion about the suit, Three Expo Events v. City of Dallas, likely happened behind closed doors, as the council has held numerous executive sessions over the years to discuss the ongoing litigation.
The $650,000 comes from the city's risk management fund and is meant to pay Three Expo, its attorney Roger Albright and anyone else with an interest in the case, said the city's settlement resolution.
“It is in the best interest of the city to settle this lawsuit,” said the resolution.
The city initially won a motion to dismiss the case in the trial court, based on lack of the plaintiffs' standing, but then Three Expo won an appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Texas Lawyer previously reported on the Fifth Circuit ruling. Three Expo in 2015 held an Exxxotica event, featuring near nudity and sexually suggestive activities, that drew opposition from some Dallas citizens on moral and civic grounds.
In 2016, Three Expo was in the process of drafting another contract to hold Exxxotica 2016 at the convention center, but the mayor said he did not want the event to return to the city. Many council members supported the mayor's position. Even after the Dallas city attorney told the council that barring Exxxotica from the convention center would violate the business's free-speech rights, the council voted to adopt a resolution for the city to decline to enter a contract to lease the convention center for Exxxotica. Three Expo sued the city two weeks later, in February 2016.
“The mayor and the city council made clear at the city council meeting their firm and deliberate decision to exclude Exxxotica 2016 from the convention center under any circumstance and regardless of the legal consequences,” wrote Circuit Judge James Dennis.
Three Expo's lawyer, Roger Albright of Sheils Winnubst in Richardson, didn't return a call seeking comment. Neither did Dallas Assistant City Attorney Stacy Jordan Rodriguez, nor anyone in the city's public affairs office.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFilm Company Alleges Elon Musk, Tesla Used AI to Mimic 'Blade Runner' Scene
6 minute readLive Nation Targeted in Lawsuit Over 2021 Music Festival Crowd Crush
Distributor Hopes Bootleggers 'Can't Get No Satisfaction' Selling Unauthorized Rolling Stones Merch
2 minute readFormer Bumble Legal Chief Takes CLO Posts at 2 NYC Public Companies
Trending Stories
- 1'There is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
- 2The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 3Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 4In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 5Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250