Statewide Vacation Letter for Texas Lawyers Among New Bar President's Plans to Help Litigators
Texas Lawyer sat down with new State Bar of Texas President Randy Sorrels to learn more about his plans for family leave continuance rules, a statewide vacation letter and an e-filing consistency project.
June 17, 2019 at 01:02 PM
4 minute read
New State Bar of Texas President Randy Sorrels plans to focus his term on projects to help lawyers' everyday needs.
As attorneys at the State Bar Annual Meeting in Austin on June 14 feasted on a lunch of steak, vegetables and chocolate mousse, Sorrels spoke to them about his plans for family leave continuance rules, a statewide vacation letter, an e-filing consistency project and more.
Texas Lawyer sat down with Sorrels, partner in Houston's Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Aziz, to learn more about his plans. Here are his answers, edited for brevity and clarity.
I was interested to hear about your family leave continuance plans. What is the problem you are seeing in the legal profession that needs this solution?
It affects both men and women, but it affects women in a disproportionate manner because they know they are going to carry this baby, hopefully for nine months, and they are looking at their calendars. Every one of them looks to see when that due date month is—what's going on there. They say, 'I'm trying to keep a practice. I want to be a lawyer throughout this. There's all these things I have to juggle.' We want to put certainty in their lives that if they have been the lead lawyer on a case and they have been doing all the work, that they will get that relief for the birth or adoption—automatic, no discretion by unfriendly counsel or an unfriendly judge.
During your speech, you got a lot of applause when you were talking about a statewide vacation letter. What's the issue that you want to fix?
I practice in Harris County and I can file a vacation form—It's very simple with the county. But if I also have cases in other counties, which I do, I have to figure out their process and steps and go through all of those. It takes a significant amount of time and calendaring and making sure I do everything right in those courts and counties to have vacation time properly preserved and protected. The idea is that if I can send one letter through a central portal—and there's a way to do that—and be recognized universally throughout the 254 courts, it saves the lawyer and their law firm and their staff all this time of worrying, 'Did I get it right?' for each particular county. It's a common-sense solution to problems we are all dealing with in the month of June. Most people take vacations in the summer.
Another of your projects aims for e-filing consistency across Texas. What's your idea to tackle that problem?
You know, the PACER system was thrust upon the nation and I'm sure there was a lot of resistance, because we are all resistant to change. Within six months everyone was saying, 'This is great.' The lawyers of Texas are like, 'Just give us PACER and we'd be thrilled.' We are making incremental steps slowly, but we need to pick up the pace and understand it really is a daily dilemma for a lot of lawyers and law firms. We are going to ask the Supreme Court to continue to advanced programs. There is a software program they are working on that since the 254 counties can't agree on what to do, the software program is supposed to take the document and decipher that particular county's filing rules and spit it to them in their particular way. Let's get this fixed once and for all, sooner rather than later.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAkin, Baker Botts, Vinson & Elkins Are First Texas Big Law Firms to Match Milbank Bonuses
4 minute readAnticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readRevenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250