One Houston Criminal Defense Lawyer Sues Another Over Shared Rent
Kent Schaffer sued David Bires, who started a firm called Bires & Schaffer in 1988, for allegedly failing to pay his entire share of monthly rent of office space.
June 18, 2019 at 05:41 PM
4 minute read
Houston criminal defense attorney Kent Schaffer is suing his longtime office mate, David Bires, for breach of contract for allegedly failing to pay half of their office lease in June.
In a petition filed on Tuesday in state district court in Harris County, Schaffer alleged that Bires, who is also a criminal defense lawyer, is obligated to pay $6,992 for the month of June, but only paid $1,576.
“As a result of Bires' breach, Schaffer has suffered damages in the amount of $5,417,” Schaffer alleged in the petition in Schaffer v. Bires.
Bires, who left the joint office space in December, said Tuesday, “We don't want dirty laundry flapping around in the breeze,” and declined to comment further.
According to the petition, Schaffer and Bires started a firm together in 1988, Bires & Schaffer but never created a “formal Texas entity.” They agreed to operate separate law practices in a joint office space, and to split the operating expenses such as administrative support, rent, common spaces and utilities.
They agreed, Schaffer alleged in the petition, that any income from providing part of a joint office space to other lawyers would be applied to toward the payment of operating expenses and they would split the net cost each month.
Based on that understanding, Schaffer alleged, he and Bires co-signed a 10-year lease in 2011 for office space in downtown Houston. Over the years, he and Bires split the net cost for the office after payments from other lawyers using the office space were credited, he alleged.
However, Schaffer alleged, Bires notified him last December that he “no longer wished to participate in this business arrangement and that he intended to abandon the office space.”
Bires left on Dec. 15, 2018, Schaffer said in the petition.
In the several months since then, Bires continued to pay Schaffer his half of the base rent, an amount that was net of payments from other lawyers using the office space, the petition said.
“Several times after Bires abandoned the office space, he sent Schaffer a check for his percentage of the base rent,” Schaffer alleged.
That ended in June, when “contrary to his conduct for the past eight years,” Bires decided to “unilaterally reduce” the amount he would pay, Schaffer alleged.
“Despite the fact that Schaffer has attempted to mitigate his damages by finding new occupants … Bires refuses to pay Schaffer an amount that would result in Schaffer's payment of only one-half of the base rent,” the petition said.
In an interview Tuesday, Schaffer, whose firm is now called Schaffer Carter & Associates, said “the lease is still in effect and so I”m responsible for half, he's responsible for half.”
He said Bires did not give him a reason for paying the reduced amount in June. As to their relationship, Schaffer said “it's over.”
A photographer in his spare time, Schaffer represented Houston financier R. Allen Stanford, and he is also one of the special prosecutors in Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's criminal prosecution.
|Read More
Houston Lawyer Kent Schaffer's Out of the Office, Exploring the World
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDLA Piper Sued by 2 Houston Companies, Alleging a 'Fake Lawyer' Represented Them in Argentina
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250