After Defense Counsel's Email Snafu, Houston Lawyer Facing Tax Evasion Gets Continuance
Steve Pursley is under indictment for federal tax evasion. “We have great respect for the legal process and are confident the truth will come out during the trial,” according to an email by Barnes & Thornburg partner Victor Vital of Dallas, who now represents Pursley.
June 21, 2019 at 04:39 PM
4 minute read
Houston attorney Steve Pursley, who's under indictment for federal tax evasion, won a trial continuance on Thursday because he swapped out his defense counsel after an email snafu led his former lawyer to allege that prosecutors tampered with a court record.
The trial was scheduled for Tuesday but will now occur in September to give Pursley's new attorneys time to prepare for trial. Pursley has pleaded not guilty to charges of conspiracy to defraud the United States and three counts of tax evasion.
“We have great respect for the legal process and are confident the truth will come out during the trial,” according to an email by Barnes & Thornburg partner Victor Vital of Dallas, who now represents Pursley.
The government alleged in a September 2018 indictment in United States v. Pursley, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, that Pursley helped a co-conspirator bring more than $18 million of untaxed funds from offshore accounts into the United States between 2007 and 2013.
Shaun Mooney was Pursley's co-conspirator, according to government filings in the case. Separately, Pursley has sued Mooney, alleging a civil contract dispute.
“Shaun Mooney has admitted to cheating on his taxes. Instead of taking responsibility for his own actions, he blamed Mr. Pursley after Mr. Pursley filed a public lawsuit against Mr. Mooney in a Texas court,” Vital said.
Hughes Arrell Kinchen partner Michael Wynne, who represents Mooney, said any allegation that Mooney cheated on his taxes is something for the government to pursue or not to pursue.
“I”m not going to comment,” Wynne said. “The facts will come out during the course of the trial.”
The government alleged that Pursley represented Mooney, who was a college friend, between 2006 and 2013. Mooney owned a company, Southeastern Shipping Company Ltd., which staffed offshore oil rigs in the Middle East. The alleged scheme was complicated, involving a series of shell companies and bank accounts. Essentially, the pair would transfer funds from the foreign company's bank account to Pursley and Mooney's companies' U.S. bank accounts in different ways, like false stock purchases, and the false sale of Southeastern Shipping.
The government alleged that for his role in the scheme, Pursley earned more than $4.8 million, plus an interest in Mooney's business, and then filed false income tax returns to avoid paying taxes, said the indictment.
Pursley argued in an October 2018 motion that he fully reported his income on his tax returns, and the government hadn't alleged any act against him that constitutes tax evasion.
Ron Braver, a certified public accountant who is an expert witness on Pursley's side, argued in a June 17 report that the government has made mistakes and some of the government's allegations of taxes owed by Pursley for stock purchases should have been assessed against Mooney and his company.
“Any reporting issues appear to be no more than mistakes or accidents or errors, including those of or attributable to Pursley's tax preparers and bookkeepers,” said the report. “Pursley paid taxes after learning of the potential or possible mistakes.”
Email Snafu and Sanctions Request
The government and Parsley have clashed over the government's deposition of a witness who was a compliance officer for a financial company who allegedly had knowledge about the defendant's tax scheme.
Pursley alleged in a June 6 motion for sanctions that the government tampered with the deposition transcript by telling a court reporter to make changes in the transcript without telling defense counsel or the court.
The government countered that the allegations were baseless, claiming that the transcription service emailed defense counsel on May 8 with a copy of the revised transcript.
Pursley clarified his motion for sanctions on June 10 and explained that Pursley's attorney, Ashley Arnett, checked her spam folder and located the May 8 email with the revised transcript.
The very next day, Pursley noted in a filing that his relationship with Arnett and another of his attorneys, Michael Minns, had deteriorated. He asked for a continuance of his June 18 trial to allow his new lead attorney, Vital, to ensure an orderly transition for the trial, the motion said.
U.S. Department of Justice spokeswoman Ali Kjergaard declined to comment on the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEversheds Sutherland Adds Hunton Andrews Energy Lawyer With Cross-Border Experience
3 minute readEx-Marathon General Counsel Takes Legal Reins of Another Energy Company
Bracewell Adds Former Pioneer Natural Resources Lawyer to O&G, Energy Transition Practices
2 minute readExxonMobil Sues California AG Bonta, Environmental Groups for Advanced Recycling 'Smear Campaign'
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250