Combined Revenue for High-Grossing Texas Firms Up in 2018
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld continues its reign at the top of the gross revenue chart on Texas Lawyer's Annual Report on Firm Finance.
June 27, 2019 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Fewer firms are on Texas Lawyer's Annual Report on Firm Finance this year, but despite increased competition in Texas, the firms combined to collect greater revenue in 2018 than the year before.
Gross revenue for the 17 Texas firms totaled $5.175 billion in 2018, up 3.3% from $5.011 billion that same group of firms earned in 2017.
This year's Annual Report on Firm Finance only includes 17 firms because three large Texas firms—Andrews Kurth Kenyon, Gardere Wynne Sewell and Strasburger & Price—merged in 2018 with national firms headquartered outside the Lone Star State.
It's clear that Texas' robust economy resulted in mounds of work in 2018 for large Texas firms.
All but two of the firms brought in more revenue in 2018 than the prior year, with litigation boutique Susman Godfrey, which takes some work on a contingency-fee basis, posting an impressive 40.1% increase in revenue.
The only declines were at Baker Botts, where revenue declined by 7.3%, because contingency-fee revenue was higher in 2017, and at intellectual property boutique Patterson + Sheridan, which posted a 9.8% drop because of some departures during the year.
The overall positive revenue picture comes even as homegrown Texas firms face intense competition from national and international firms that moved into the Texas market in 2018, hired away productive laterals, and scuffled for business.
While energy work is exceedingly important in Texas, managing partners of some firms noted that capital markets work in the energy sector was soft during 2018 because of the price of oil, but the firm leaders cited other practices areas as booming in contrast, such as real estate, litigation, private equity and all aspects of technology work. Additionally, a number of the firms also received a boost of revenue from international offices including London.
Texas Lawyer's Annual Report on Firm Finance includes financials from 17 large and high-grossing firms in Texas that appeared on the list last year.
While total revenue improved for the 17 firms, so did net income. Taken as a whole, net income at the firms totaled $2.169 billion in 2018, up 1.3% when compared with $2.141 billion in the prior year.
Porter Hedges saw its net income improve by the largest margin—a 19.4% increase—and a dozen other firms also boosted their net income for the year. Declines in net income for the Texas firms were relatively small, with Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld and Baker Botts each posting the largest decrease of 4.1%.
Revenue per lawyer (RPL) and profits per equity partner (PEP) improved at the firms in 2018. RPL averaged $840,000 at the 17 firms, up 5.3% when compared with $798,000 for those firms in 2017. PEP came in at an average of $1.326 million for the 17 firms, up 6.9% when compared with $1.244 million the prior year.
PEP exceeded $1 million at 12 of the 17 firms.
Those four measures in the Texas Lawyer Annual Report on Firm Finance—gross revenue, net income, RPL and PEP—help describe each firm's financial performance and provide a means for comparison. The gross revenue chart is the master list for the report.
Akin Gump again tops the gross revenue chart with $1.071 billion in 2018, up 3.1% when compared with 2017. Fifteen of the firms brought in more revenue in 2018 than in 2017 and two had lower revenue.
Akin Gump also topped the net income chart, with $445 million in 2018, 4.1% less than the year before. Net income improved at 13 firms and declined at four.
Susman Godfrey, the litigation firm, led the RPL chart with $1.926 million, up 25.6% when compared with 2017. RPL improved at 13 firms, but declined at only four. The highest decline was at Patterson + Sheridan, with a 17.1% drop.
Susman Godfrey also led the PEP ranking, with $2.585 million, up 7.7% from 2017. All of the firms, except for Baker Botts and Kelly Hart & Hallman, improved PEP in 2018.
The report also includes a firm-by-firm analysis that helps explain financial results at each of the firms.
The fact that lawyers from the firms are quoted in this report is no indication of the firm's cooperation with the preparation of the Annual Report on Firm Finance. Lawyers simply responded to questions about work and developments at their firms in 2018. Texas Lawyer does not identify which firms provide financial information to ALM and which do not.
All of the revenue figures in the charts are for the calendar year 2018. All lawyer counts are full-time equivalent for the firm's fiscal year. All numbers are rounded to the nearest 1,000.
|See the Charts:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDLA Piper Sued by 2 Houston Companies, Alleging a 'Fake Lawyer' Represented Them in Argentina
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
- 2Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
- 3Texas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
- 4Quinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
- 5Manufacturer Must Provide Details Surrounding Expert’s Livestreamed Inspection, Fed Court Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250