Mexican Private Power Sector Finds Alternative to Canceled Clean Energy Power Bids
On January 31, 2019 the Mexican power regulatory entity — Centro Nacional de Control de Energia (“Cenace”) canceled the fourth public bid…
July 15, 2019 at 08:00 AM
6 minute read
On January 31, 2019 the Mexican power regulatory entity — Centro Nacional de Control de Energia (“Cenace”) canceled the fourth public bid for the purchase and sale of clean energy, capacity and clean energy certificates (“CEL”). This decision was extremely controversial, given that the first three bids were very successful and incentivized clean energy investment and project development in Mexico, particularly for solar and wind projects. The new administration has taken certain actions that have had the effect of slowing down the execution of agreements with the state utility, CFE. However, applicable law establishes two obligations that will continue to foster the development of new electricity projects in Mexico and the execution of power purchase agreements between private parties: i) the obligation to obtain CELs and ii) the obligation for utilities to execute power purchase agreements to guarantee the estimated consumption of their load points. Such obligations apply to all wholesale electricity market participants and, therefore, opportunities for investments in power projects in Mexico must continue.
The Obligation to Obtain Clean Energy Certificates
CELs are instruments issued by the Energy Regulatory Commission — Comisión Nacional de Energia (“CRE”) that evidence the generation of a specific amount of energy from clean energy sources. A generator will receive one CEL per each MWh of clean energy. Pursuant to Mexican law, power utilities and certain users (“Obligated Parties”) must comply with CEL obligations, which means that they must buy a certain amount of CELs every year. CELs can be purchased at the wholesale electricity market or through bilateral agreements. The obligation to obtain CELs falls upon the Obligated Parties, not the generators. That is, Obligated Parties must acquire an amount of CELs equivalent to a certain percentage of the yearly consumption of the load points that they serve.
If an Obligated Party fails to comply with its CEL obligations, CRE may impose sanctions and the payment of such sanctions does not exempt the Obligated Party from the obligation to buy the amount of CELs not liquidated in due time. So, if sanctioned, the relevant party must cover the outstanding CELs and pay the applicable fine. Since Obligated Parties need to purchase CELs and only generators with clean energy projects will obtain CELs, Obligated Parties will need to execute power purchase agreements with generators to secure CELs and to avoid sanctions. Also, the purchase of CELs will generate additional revenue for generators, who can use such cash flow to potentially secure project finance and develop new projects.
The Obligation for Utilities to Execute Power Purchase Agreements
Mexican law establishes that utilities must enter into power purchase agreements for the purchase of energy, capacity and CELs with generators in order to secure a certain percentage of the estimated consumption of their load points. If a utility fails to comply with its energy, capacity or CEL requirements, CRE can impose sanctions.
The criteria to impose sanctions on utilities depending on the percentage of noncompliance with the requirement to purchase capacity is as follows:
0% to 25% of capacity requirement | 26% to 50% of capacity requirement | 51% to 75% of capacity requirement | 76% to 100% of capacity requirement | |
First time | 8 minimum wages (approx. 42.4 USD) per MW per hour | 10 minimum wages (approx. 53 USD) per MW per hour | 12 minimum wages (approx. 63.6 USD) per MW per hour | 15 minimum wages (approx. 79.5 USD) per MW per hour |
Second time | 16 minimum wages (approx. 84.8 USD) per MW per hour | 20 minimum wages (approx. 106 USD) per MW per hour
| 24 minimum wages (approx. 127.2 USD) per MW per hour | 30 minimum wages (approx. 159 USD) per MW per hour |
Third time or more | 24 minimum wages (approx. 127.2 USD) per MW per hour | 30 minimum wages (approx. 159 USD) per MW per hour | 36 minimum wages (approx. 190.8 USD) per MW per hour | 45 minimum wages (approx. 238.5 USD) per MW per hour |
Similar sanctions apply to utilities that fail to comply with their CEL requirements, incentivizing them to secure their CELs and capacity requirements through the execution of long-term power purchase agreements to avoid being fined by CRE.
Before cancellation of the fourth bid by the new Mexican administration, long-term public auctions were the main instrument to obtain long-term power purchase agreements to secure CELs, capacity and power obligations. The cancellation forced the private sector to search for alternatives to comply with the obligations to obtain CELs and execute long term power purchase agreements. As a result, a new energy long term tender process was announced by Bravos Energia. This is a new platform to manage bids between private parties that would not need the participation of the government.
Bravos Energia, whose partner Jeff Pavlovic was key in developing the regulations for the wholesale electricity market, and Aklara, the company responsible for the online platform used in the now canceled public bids, will coordinate the new private bids. In such bids, power purchase agreements for CELs, power and capacity will be awarded with a term of five, 10 or 15 years. Any wholesale electricity market participant, including the state utility, may participate. The bids were officially launched on June 27 and it is expected that the agreements will be awarded this year.
Vera de Gyarfas, a partner in King & Spalding's Corporate Finance and Investments practice in Houston, specializes in transactions involving energy projects in Latin America and Africa. She can be reached at [email protected].
Marco Portillo is a foreign associate in King & Spalding's Corporate Finance and Investments practice in Houston. He has extensive experience regarding the new legislation enacted after the Mexican energy reform in 2013 and has advised clients regarding power generation, transmission and commercialization transactions, as well as upstream, midstream and downstream projects in Mexico. He can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNondisparagement Clauses in Divorce: Balancing Family Harmony and Free Speech
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250