Mexican Private Power Sector Finds Alternative to Canceled Clean Energy Power Bids
On January 31, 2019 the Mexican power regulatory entity — Centro Nacional de Control de Energia (“Cenace”) canceled the fourth public bid…
July 15, 2019 at 08:00 AM
6 minute read
On January 31, 2019 the Mexican power regulatory entity — Centro Nacional de Control de Energia (“Cenace”) canceled the fourth public bid for the purchase and sale of clean energy, capacity and clean energy certificates (“CEL”). This decision was extremely controversial, given that the first three bids were very successful and incentivized clean energy investment and project development in Mexico, particularly for solar and wind projects. The new administration has taken certain actions that have had the effect of slowing down the execution of agreements with the state utility, CFE. However, applicable law establishes two obligations that will continue to foster the development of new electricity projects in Mexico and the execution of power purchase agreements between private parties: i) the obligation to obtain CELs and ii) the obligation for utilities to execute power purchase agreements to guarantee the estimated consumption of their load points. Such obligations apply to all wholesale electricity market participants and, therefore, opportunities for investments in power projects in Mexico must continue.
The Obligation to Obtain Clean Energy Certificates
CELs are instruments issued by the Energy Regulatory Commission — Comisión Nacional de Energia (“CRE”) that evidence the generation of a specific amount of energy from clean energy sources. A generator will receive one CEL per each MWh of clean energy. Pursuant to Mexican law, power utilities and certain users (“Obligated Parties”) must comply with CEL obligations, which means that they must buy a certain amount of CELs every year. CELs can be purchased at the wholesale electricity market or through bilateral agreements. The obligation to obtain CELs falls upon the Obligated Parties, not the generators. That is, Obligated Parties must acquire an amount of CELs equivalent to a certain percentage of the yearly consumption of the load points that they serve.
If an Obligated Party fails to comply with its CEL obligations, CRE may impose sanctions and the payment of such sanctions does not exempt the Obligated Party from the obligation to buy the amount of CELs not liquidated in due time. So, if sanctioned, the relevant party must cover the outstanding CELs and pay the applicable fine. Since Obligated Parties need to purchase CELs and only generators with clean energy projects will obtain CELs, Obligated Parties will need to execute power purchase agreements with generators to secure CELs and to avoid sanctions. Also, the purchase of CELs will generate additional revenue for generators, who can use such cash flow to potentially secure project finance and develop new projects.
The Obligation for Utilities to Execute Power Purchase Agreements
Mexican law establishes that utilities must enter into power purchase agreements for the purchase of energy, capacity and CELs with generators in order to secure a certain percentage of the estimated consumption of their load points. If a utility fails to comply with its energy, capacity or CEL requirements, CRE can impose sanctions.
The criteria to impose sanctions on utilities depending on the percentage of noncompliance with the requirement to purchase capacity is as follows:
0% to 25% of capacity requirement | 26% to 50% of capacity requirement | 51% to 75% of capacity requirement | 76% to 100% of capacity requirement | |
First time | 8 minimum wages (approx. 42.4 USD) per MW per hour | 10 minimum wages (approx. 53 USD) per MW per hour | 12 minimum wages (approx. 63.6 USD) per MW per hour | 15 minimum wages (approx. 79.5 USD) per MW per hour |
Second time | 16 minimum wages (approx. 84.8 USD) per MW per hour | 20 minimum wages (approx. 106 USD) per MW per hour | 24 minimum wages (approx. 127.2 USD) per MW per hour | 30 minimum wages (approx. 159 USD) per MW per hour |
Third time or more | 24 minimum wages (approx. 127.2 USD) per MW per hour | 30 minimum wages (approx. 159 USD) per MW per hour | 36 minimum wages (approx. 190.8 USD) per MW per hour | 45 minimum wages (approx. 238.5 USD) per MW per hour |
Similar sanctions apply to utilities that fail to comply with their CEL requirements, incentivizing them to secure their CELs and capacity requirements through the execution of long-term power purchase agreements to avoid being fined by CRE.
Before cancellation of the fourth bid by the new Mexican administration, long-term public auctions were the main instrument to obtain long-term power purchase agreements to secure CELs, capacity and power obligations. The cancellation forced the private sector to search for alternatives to comply with the obligations to obtain CELs and execute long term power purchase agreements. As a result, a new energy long term tender process was announced by Bravos Energia. This is a new platform to manage bids between private parties that would not need the participation of the government.
Bravos Energia, whose partner Jeff Pavlovic was key in developing the regulations for the wholesale electricity market, and Aklara, the company responsible for the online platform used in the now canceled public bids, will coordinate the new private bids. In such bids, power purchase agreements for CELs, power and capacity will be awarded with a term of five, 10 or 15 years. Any wholesale electricity market participant, including the state utility, may participate. The bids were officially launched on June 27 and it is expected that the agreements will be awarded this year.
Vera de Gyarfas, a partner in King & Spalding's Corporate Finance and Investments practice in Houston, specializes in transactions involving energy projects in Latin America and Africa. She can be reached at [email protected].
Marco Portillo is a foreign associate in King & Spalding's Corporate Finance and Investments practice in Houston. He has extensive experience regarding the new legislation enacted after the Mexican energy reform in 2013 and has advised clients regarding power generation, transmission and commercialization transactions, as well as upstream, midstream and downstream projects in Mexico. He can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Narcissist’s Dilemma: Balancing Power and Inadequacy in Family Law
8 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250