Former Texas Judge Denounces Trump for Racism, Leaves Republican Party
"What I know for sure is that we, as a country, are better than this," wrote former Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Judge Elsa Alcala.
July 16, 2019 at 02:52 PM
4 minute read
Former Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Judge Elsa Alcala, a longtime Republican, typically avoids politics on social media but broke that practice on Monday to denounce President Donald Trump, “for my own conscience,” she wrote on Facebook.
Trump “is the worst president in the history of this country,” said her Facebook post. The president has an ideology of racism, the judge wrote, adding she couldn't say anything positive that would absolve Trump of his “rotten core.”
“I have been thinking about this for years and I hoped things would get better but they never did,” Alcala told Texas Lawyer. “I did not want an 'R' next to my name anymore.”
In Texas, judicial races are partisan, meaning that judges campaign as Republicans or Democrats. Repeated efforts over many years to reform the judicial election system and do away with partisanship have failed.
Alcala's Facebook post comes in the wake of Trump's tweets this week that said a group of Democratic lawmakers—all women of color—should go back where they came from. Trump alleged they hated America. Tuesday evening, the U.S. House plans to vote on a resolution to condemn the president's tweets as “racist language.”
|
“I did not want an 'R' next to my name anymore.” —Elsa Alcala
In her post, Alcala urged readers not to “tell me to go back where I came from,” because she was born in the United States, and her family has resided in Texas since before it became part of the Union.
“I spent 29 years in government service to help the people of our country and I love our country and its people,” Alcala wrote. “I have given more to this country than the vast majority of people. What I know for sure is that we, as a country, are better than this.”
Alcala became the first Hispanic female judge of the Court of Criminal Appeals in 2011 when then-Gov. Rick Perry appointed her to fill a vacancy on the high court. She told Texas Lawyer at the time that she believed it was important to have highly qualified minority jurists serving on the bench at all levels of the Texas judiciary.
She wrote on Facebook that she supported past Republican administrations because they wanted an inclusive party, but because the current Republican party supports the president, she plans to vote in the Democratic primary for the first time in 20 years.
“I hope Democrats rise to the occasion and put forth some very qualified candidates and that every polling station will be overwhelmed with voters,” Alcala wrote.
Alcala has worked in the government nearly her whole legal career. Just after earning her law degree from the University of Texas School of Law in 1989, she worked as a prosecutor for nine years in the Harris County District Attorney's Office in Houston. Alcala then served as the judge of Harris County's 338th District Court from 1999 to 2002. Next, she became an appellate justice on Houston's First Court of Appeals, where she worked for nine years. In 2011, then-Gov. Rick Perry appointed her to a vacant seat on the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, where she served until she chose not to seek reelection in 2018.
When she left the high court, from January to May, she was the policy director of the Texas Defender Service, a nonprofit founded by death penalty attorneys that works to improve legal representation for death penalty defendants and to highlight and solve “systemic flaws plaguing the Texas death penalty,” the service's website said. Alcala is now a solo practitioner practicing public interest law in Austin.
She has already experienced some blowback from her Facebook post, noting in an update to the post that she had to delete comments that were name-calling, and she blocked some former relatives who commented with “hurtful and incorrect information.”
“I knew this would be a hot-button topic, so I delayed saying it publicly for quite some time. I needed to get the 'R' off of my name, so I had to say this publicly,” she explained.
Read Alcala's Facebook post:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readOvertime Rewind: Texas Court Ruling Unravels FLSA Salary Level Increases
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settle Defamation Lawsuit Before Depositions
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250