Tony Buzbee Alleges Fee Shakedown by Rival Firm
Mayoral candidate Tony Buzbee says Houston's Terry & Thweatt went after his client for a cut of contingency fees even though it was never hired to represent the client. Terry & Thweatt counters that Buzbee is ignoring the law.
July 18, 2019 at 03:20 PM
3 minute read
Prominent trial lawyer and current Houston mayoral candidate Tony Buzbee sued rival Houston plaintiffs firm Terry & Thweatt this week, claiming the firm demanded hundreds of thousands of dollars from one of Buzbee's clients despite never having been retained.
Buzbee filed the suit Tuesday in Harris County District court on behalf of client John Luengas, whose daughter died in a car accident two years ago. The complaint said that after her death, Luengas reached out to multiple law firms, including Terry & Thweatt, to inquire about potential representation. Buzbee asserts that Luengas never retained Terry & Thweatt or signed a contract to work with it, and instead hired Buzbee's firm to represent him in litigation over the accident.
The lawsuit, filed July 16 in Harris County District Court, alleges Terry & Thweatt is improperly attempting to lay claim to “several hundreds of thousands of dollars” in attorney fees from Luengas and his daughter's estate. Terry & Thweatt never provided any legal services to Luengas, according to the petition.
“When Jade [my wife] and I lost our only daughter, we were devastated,” Luengas wrote in an emailed statement. “Now, this lawyer Lee Thweatt and his firm are adding to our grief by trying to extract a lot of money from us. Lee Thweatt has never been my lawyer and I never even considered hiring him.”
But Tommy Hastings, a malpractice attorney representing Terry & Thweatt in the dispute, said the firm never made any demands of Luengas. Instead, he said that while Luengas was “in the process” of retaining Terry & Thweatt, it was his ex-wife, Jade James, who actually signed a contingency fee contract with the firm. He said James quickly terminated the firm to accept representation from Buzbee, and attempts the firm made to discuss potential fees owed by James were unsuccessful.
As recounted by the Houston Chronicle, Luengas' 18-year-old daughter had been working as a dancer at the Splendor Gentlemens Club when she died in June 2017. Buzbee sued the club on Luenguas' behalf earlier this year, alleging it served drinks to the underage woman and then allowed her to drive home intoxicated, leading to a fatal collision.
In the lawsuit against Splendor Gentlemens Club, the Harris County district court lists Buzbee as Luengas' attorney. Terry & Thweatt is not listed.
The new case, if it proceeds, is likely to raise questions about when it is appropriate to charge contingency fees, and how much may be collected, after a client ends a relationship with a law firm. According to a 1969 Texas Supreme Court decision, Mandell and Wright v. Thomas, when a client fires an attorney without good cause, the attorney has a right to recover on a contingency fee contract.
“[Terry & Thweatt] tried to resolve the matter with Buzbee Law Firm at the very beginning, and they totally and completely ignored Texas law,” Hastings said.
On the other hand, in a 2006 Texas Supreme Court decision, Hoover Slovacek LLP v. Walton, the court reevaluated its stance on contingency fee agreements and concluded that under certain circumstances, it would be unconscionable for an attorney to collect the 40% normally owed under a standard contingency fee contract.
“Trying to extract an unreasonable fee after doing no work on the case is unconscionable,” Tony Buzbee said. “This family has suffered enough.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAkin, Baker Botts, Vinson & Elkins Are First Texas Big Law Firms to Match Milbank Bonuses
4 minute readAnticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readRevenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250