Tony Buzbee Alleges Fee Shakedown by Rival Firm
Mayoral candidate Tony Buzbee says Houston's Terry & Thweatt went after his client for a cut of contingency fees even though it was never hired to represent the client. Terry & Thweatt counters that Buzbee is ignoring the law.
July 18, 2019 at 03:20 PM
3 minute read
Prominent trial lawyer and current Houston mayoral candidate Tony Buzbee sued rival Houston plaintiffs firm Terry & Thweatt this week, claiming the firm demanded hundreds of thousands of dollars from one of Buzbee's clients despite never having been retained.
Buzbee filed the suit Tuesday in Harris County District court on behalf of client John Luengas, whose daughter died in a car accident two years ago. The complaint said that after her death, Luengas reached out to multiple law firms, including Terry & Thweatt, to inquire about potential representation. Buzbee asserts that Luengas never retained Terry & Thweatt or signed a contract to work with it, and instead hired Buzbee's firm to represent him in litigation over the accident.
The lawsuit, filed July 16 in Harris County District Court, alleges Terry & Thweatt is improperly attempting to lay claim to “several hundreds of thousands of dollars” in attorney fees from Luengas and his daughter's estate. Terry & Thweatt never provided any legal services to Luengas, according to the petition.
“When Jade [my wife] and I lost our only daughter, we were devastated,” Luengas wrote in an emailed statement. “Now, this lawyer Lee Thweatt and his firm are adding to our grief by trying to extract a lot of money from us. Lee Thweatt has never been my lawyer and I never even considered hiring him.”
But Tommy Hastings, a malpractice attorney representing Terry & Thweatt in the dispute, said the firm never made any demands of Luengas. Instead, he said that while Luengas was “in the process” of retaining Terry & Thweatt, it was his ex-wife, Jade James, who actually signed a contingency fee contract with the firm. He said James quickly terminated the firm to accept representation from Buzbee, and attempts the firm made to discuss potential fees owed by James were unsuccessful.
As recounted by the Houston Chronicle, Luengas' 18-year-old daughter had been working as a dancer at the Splendor Gentlemens Club when she died in June 2017. Buzbee sued the club on Luenguas' behalf earlier this year, alleging it served drinks to the underage woman and then allowed her to drive home intoxicated, leading to a fatal collision.
In the lawsuit against Splendor Gentlemens Club, the Harris County district court lists Buzbee as Luengas' attorney. Terry & Thweatt is not listed.
The new case, if it proceeds, is likely to raise questions about when it is appropriate to charge contingency fees, and how much may be collected, after a client ends a relationship with a law firm. According to a 1969 Texas Supreme Court decision, Mandell and Wright v. Thomas, when a client fires an attorney without good cause, the attorney has a right to recover on a contingency fee contract.
“[Terry & Thweatt] tried to resolve the matter with Buzbee Law Firm at the very beginning, and they totally and completely ignored Texas law,” Hastings said.
On the other hand, in a 2006 Texas Supreme Court decision, Hoover Slovacek LLP v. Walton, the court reevaluated its stance on contingency fee agreements and concluded that under certain circumstances, it would be unconscionable for an attorney to collect the 40% normally owed under a standard contingency fee contract.
“Trying to extract an unreasonable fee after doing no work on the case is unconscionable,” Tony Buzbee said. “This family has suffered enough.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFoley Partner Wrapping Up Long Legal Career, 29 Years of Chairing MLK Jr. Oratory Competition in Houston
3 minute readSunbelt Law Firms Experienced More Moderate Growth Last Year, Alongside Some Job Cuts and Less Merger Interest
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250