Houston's Kwok Daniel Settles Trademark Dispute With Hospital
Texas Children's Hospital had sued Kwok Daniel and its two name partners, alleging that the defendants used a logo from its website, in an altered form, to damage its reputation.
August 07, 2019 at 06:06 PM
3 minute read
Failing to get a trademark infringement suit dismissed on free speech grounds, Houston’s Kwok Daniel and its name partners have settled a suit filed by Texas Children’s Hospital over the use of an altered graphic from the hospital’s website.
As part of the settlement, Kwok Daniel and lawyers Robert Kwok and Thomas Daniel agreed to not use the graphic, which the firm had posted on its website last December but later removed, and to dismiss an interlocutory appeal. The hospital agreed to dismiss all claims against the defendants in the trademark infringement suit it filed in late 2018, according to a dismissal agreement.
Dale Jefferson, a partner at Martin, Disiere, Jefferson & Wisdom in Houston who represents Kwok Daniel, said other settlement terms are confidential.
Allison Miller, of counsel at Beck Redden in Houston, who represents Kwok and Daniel, could not immediately be reached for comment. Neither could Sean Jordan, a partner at Jackson Walker in Austin, who represents the hospital.
The legal dispute in Texas Children’s Hospital v. Kwok Daniel began last December when the hospital alleged that the defendants used a graphic from TCH’s website, in an altered form, to damage its reputation. The hospital sought a court order to force the firm and the two lawyers to remove the graphic, which the hospital refers to as “the Promise mark,” from the firm website.
The hospital had alleged that the defendants used the altered graphic in a “disparaging and inflammatory article” on the Kwok Daniel website about a client’s lawsuit against the hospital.
In a January motion seeking a temporary injunction, the hospital alleged that the altered graphic, and a revised one that the defendants later posted on the firm’s website, were commercial speech not protected by fair use. But after a judge denied the hospital’s request for an injunction, the Kwok defendants filed an anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss.
In that motion, the defendants sought to quickly dismiss the trademark infringement suit on the ground the hospital’s claims were an attempt to silence free speech. But a judge denied that motion in April, and the defendant firm and lawyers filed an interlocutory appeal.
On Tuesday, the First Texas Court of Appeals in Houston filed a memorandum opinion dismissing the appeal because the Kwok parties notified the court that they and Texas Children’s Hospital have agreed to settle the case.
The Texas Legislature passed a law in 2011, the Texas Citizens Participation Act, that allows judges to quickly dismiss suits that infringe on free-speech rights and forces a plaintiff to pay the defendant’s court costs. Some revisions to the law that were approved this year by the Legislature go into effect on Sept. 1.
|Read More
Houston Firm Seeks Quick Dismissal of Hospital’s Trademark Suit
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAdvising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
4 minute readHomegrown Texas Law Firms Expanded Outside the Lone Star State in 2024 As Out-of-State Firms Moved In
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
6 minute read'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250