Female GC Fuming After Plea Deal for Attorney Who Allegedly Grabbed Her Butt
“I want a conviction,” said Houston attorney Michelle Acosta about San Antonio lawyer Allan Manka, who was charged with Class C misdemeanor simple assault for allegedly grabbing Acosta's buttocks. “Giving him deferred adjudication is a small slap on the wrist.”
August 19, 2019 at 05:28 PM
5 minute read
Houston lawyer Michelle Acosta is criticizing a plea deal for opposing counsel, San Antonio attorney Allan Manka, who was charged with Class C misdemeanor assault by contact for allegedly grabbing Acosta’s buttocks in a courthouse lobby.
Acosta shared her story on Facebook, and expressed frustration at how the Wilson County Attorney’s Offices and sheriff department handled the case. She said the prosecutor who handled the case should not have offered Manka a plea deal. Her Aug. 14 post has made waves in the Texas legal community, attracting nearly 200 reactions and more than 100 comments and shares.
Manka, the male lawyer on the other side of the allegations, is a family law solo practitioner who got his law license in 1973. He initially pleaded not guilty but later accepted the plea deal in which he will pay a $400 fine and donate $100 to a children’s services nonprofit. Under the deal, he must also complete 90 days of deferred disposition, in which he must refrain from all criminal conduct to avoid the charge appearing on his record.
Manka declined to comment, but his accuser was speaking out against the deal.
“I want a conviction,” Acosta said in an interview with Texas Lawyer Monday. “Giving him deferred adjudication is a small slap on the wrist.”
Wilson County Attorney Tom Caldwell said Manka’s charge was a Class C misdemeanor, the same level as a traffic ticket, which carries a maximum fine of $500 and no jail time. It’s normal for first-time offenders to receive deferred disposition, he added.
“From a criminal standpoint, from what I’ve seen, it was simple assault. It definitely wasn’t going to rise to something we could charge more severely,” Caldwell said.
The complaint in the case said Manka intentionally or knowingly caused physical contact with Acosta by grabbing her buttocks, and he knew or should have known that she would see the contact as offensive or provocative.
In her day job, Acosta’s the general counsel of a Houston vegetation management company, but she was in Floresville on June 13 because she was representing her brother in a child custody matter. Manka represented the brother’s ex-wife.
Their clients were talking after a court hearing, and that’s when Acosta said Manka made his first unwanted touch.
“That’s when he comes around and starts putting his hand around my waist,” she said.
Her father, Hipolito Acosta, provided a witness statement that said he saw the incident. It said that when Manka touched Acosta’s waist, he, “stated that he sometimes would get close to the clients he was representing, and to make their ex-husbands feel uncomfortable, [he] would put his arms around them.”
Later, the clients announced that they wanted to work out their dispute for the benefit of their daughter. The lawyers negotiated a Rule 11 agreement, said Acosta. In the end, Acosta said she moved to shake Manka’s hand, then the alleged assault occurred.
“He gets a handful of my rear end and squeezed. It wasn’t like a pat: It was a grab and squeeze,” she said. “It really caught me off-guard.”
The Wilson County Courthouse’s security cameras recorded Manka touching Acosta. Acosta’s brother, wearing a black shirt, was blocking the view of the moment when Acosta claimed Manka grabbed her bottom. The video shows Manka walking to Acosta’s left side and bending to the right. Next, Acosta jumped backwards and appears to hit him with her right hand. Manka’s arm blocked her, then he turned around and walked out of the courthouse. As he left, Acosta appeared to yell at him.
Watch the video:
“I said, ‘I bet you’ve been waiting to do that, huh?’ I wish I had thought of something better to say, but that’s all that came out of my mouth. I said it in an aggressive tone: I wanted him to know I was mad and not OK with what he just did,” she said.
Caldwell, the county attorney, said he urged Acosta to file a grievance against Manka with the State Bar of Texas.
“I think it’s highly unprofessional conduct by an attorney in Texas,” Caldwell said. “If he did try to intimidate her in court by doing that, it’s unconscionable behavior.”
Acosta said she’s gathering court documents and plans to file a grievance.
Read Acosta’s Facebook post:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn a Texas Growth Surge, Paul Hastings Signs New Leases in Houston, Dallas
3 minute readEnergy Lawyers Expect Demand for Energy Work to Stay Steady Under Second Trump Administration
3 minute readTexas AG Paxton Stops Biden's Spousal Parole For Undocumented Immigrants
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-59
- 2The American Lawyer Names Industry Award Winners
- 3Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
- 4Cravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
- 5Kline & Specter Hit With Lawsuit From Another Former Associate
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250