10 Busiest Employment Litigation Firms in Florida, Texas, Georgia
"At the end of the day, I think legal analytics answers more strategy questions,” said Rachel Bailey, a legal data expert at Lex Machina.
August 20, 2019 at 02:54 PM
5 minute read
Morgan & Morgan, The Buenker Law Firm, Barrett & Farahany, and Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart are among the busiest firms when it comes to employment litigation in Georgia, Florida and Texas, according to a new report issued Tuesday.
|Most active plaintiffs firms
|- Morgan & Morgan – 686 cases
- Remer & Georges-Pierre – 453 cases
- Marie A. Mattox – 388 cases
- Wenzel Fenton Cabassa – 350 cases
- Richard Celler Legal – 350 cases
Morgan & Morgan was the most active plaintiffs firm in the region, with nearly 700 cases in Georgia, Florida and Mississippi from 2016 to 2018, according to the “Employment Litigation in the Southwest Report,” by Lex Machina, a legal analytics company.
In Texas, The Buenker Law Firm had the most cases at 179.
Barrett & Farahany was busiest in Georgia with 291 cases.
Florida is home to the top five plaintiff firms: Morgan & Morgan; Remer & Georges-Pierre; Marie A. Mattox; Wenzel Fenton Cabassa; and Richard Celler Legal.
On the defense side, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart was most active, appearing in 1,000 cases, and outpacing other firms in Texas, Florida and Georgia.
|Most active defense firms
|- Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart – 1,082 cases
- Littler Mendelson – 1,002 cases
- Jackson Lewis – 867 cases
- Fisher & Phillips – 521 cases
- FordHarrison – 421 cases
Other top defense firms included Littler Mendelson, Jackson Lewis, Fisher & Phillips and FordHarrison.
“Defendants’ law firms generally saw discrimination and retaliation claims most often,” the report said.
Busy Courts
The Lex Machina report contains a large amount of data about the volume of federal employment litigation in Southeastern states, the outcome of cases, the damages that courts awarded, the top plaintiffs and defense law firms in the practice areas, and the companies that were sued most frequently.
It could offer federal employment litigators answers to strategy questions like what damages to seek, the chances of winning a trial, or the prudence of settling a case.
“At the end of the day, I think legal analytics answers more strategy questions,” said Rachel Bailey, a legal data expert at Lex Machina.
The report analyzed federal employment litigation in federal district courts in Texas, Georgia, Florida and other states within the districts of the U.S. Courts of Appeal for the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits. The types of cases included in the analysis were discrimination, harassment or retaliation claims under civil rights laws, wage and hour claims and retaliation claims under the Family and Medical Leave Act.
Since 2009, there have been 68,000 cases filed in the region, which represents one third of the more than 218,000 employment cases across the nation. Each year for the past 10 years, there were more than 6,000 cases filed in the region.
Among 19,677 cases between 2016 and 2018, 75% likely settled, 10% represented defense wins, 3% represented plaintiff’s wins and 12% ended in for procedural reasons.
|Florida, Texas awarded highest attorney fees
The Southern District of Florida was the busiest between 2016 and 2018, and 75% of its cases included Fair Labor Standards Act claims. The next busiest courts were in the Middle District of Florida, Southern District of Texas and Northern District of Georgia.
Typically, about 200 to 300 cases awarded damages each year. District courts in Florida and Texas generally awarded the most damages in collective action settlements from 2016 to 2018.
“Courts in Florida and Texas awarded the most attorneys’ fees and costs, both awarding about $6 million each,” the report said.
|Employers Win
The companies that fielded employment lawsuits most often were Walmart Stores Inc. and Walmart Stores East; the U.S. Postal Service; Sandbox Transportation, a logistics company; and United Parcel Service Inc., said the report.
“Case resolutions and findings overwhelmingly favor employers with a large number of decisions made at the summary judgment state,” according to the report.
The most common reasons that judges granted summary judgment were that they found no retaliation, no race or color discrimination, no hostile work environment or harassment, or granted the defendants a legitimate reason defense.
“Despite the fact that people may be suing for these types of things, at the end of the day for defendants’ firms, the employers are winning,” Bailey said. “This is unique in this practice area, these massive amounts of employer wins.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSalaries for Marketing, Business Development Professionals in Texas, Nationally Are Growing
4 minute readAs Global Law Firm Mergers Keep Coming, Will There Ever Be a New Swiss Verein?
Fresh Off Expansion in New York, Honolulu, Dallas-founded Thompson Coe Plans Denver Launch
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250