Citi Survey: Homegrown Texas Firms Outperform Industry in Key Areas
Texas firms shortened the collection cycle during the first half of 2019, bucking industry trends, according to Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
August 21, 2019 at 04:45 PM
3 minute read
Texas firms beat industry averages for growth in revenue and billing rates during the first half of 2019, but productivity declined by a greater margin than the market, Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group reported this week.
Revenue improved by 4.6% at the 11 Texas firms that provided data to the Law Firm Group for its first-half 2019 survey, compared with a more modest average growth of 4.1% for the 191 firms surveyed industrywide.
Billing rates helped drive that growth at the Texas firms, increasing by 6% over the first six months of the year, compared with rate growth of 4.6% for the industry.
Gretta Rusanow, head of advisory services at Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group, said in an interview that revenue growth at the Texas firms was driven by the billing rate increases and a shorter collection cycle.
The collection cycle shortened by 3.8% at the Texas firms during the first half of 2019, in contrast to a 1.6% lengthening for the industry as a whole.
But while clients were paying their Texas firms, Rusanow said, inventory improved by only 0.6% during the six months.
"There was a lot of payment out of existing inventory for the first six months. That suggests the challenge for those Texas firms has got to be more than rate increases," she said. "They need to get more work."
Inventory improved by 5.8% for the industry as a whole.
Average lawyer productivity was down by 2.4% at the Texas firms, Rusanow pointed out, which resulted from the combination of a 2.4% decline in demand during the six-month period and a 1.1% drop in total lawyer head count.
Productivity dropped by 1.2% industrywide, according to the survey, based on a 0.1% growth in demand and a 1.7% growth in lawyer head count.
Margins for the Texas firms, and industrywide, are under pressure as expenses grew at a faster rate than revenue during the period. Expenses increased by 5.5% at the Texas firms, and 5.9% industrywide.
Rusanow said expense growth was largely driven by compensation increases fueled by associate salary increases that went into effect midyear 2018.
Because of strong inventory balances at midyear, the Law Firm Group expects 2019 to be a good year for the industry compared with the last several years, but it may not reach 2018′s strong performance.
The group of firms in the survey include 77 Am Law 100 firms, 54 Second Hundred firms and 60 niche or boutique firms. Rusanow declined to categorize the 11 Texas firms by size.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllActions Speak Louder Than Words: Law Firms Shrink From 'Performative' Statements
6 minute readNorton Rose Lawyers Accused of Accessing Confidential Material in Internal IT Probe
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250