Texas Launches Public Portal to Make Most Civil Court Records Available Online
"We are proud of the greater transparency. We want people generally to see what's going on in their courts. This just enhances that," said Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Nathan Hecht.
August 21, 2019 at 06:27 PM
3 minute read
It's taken a lot longer than expected, but Texas has launched full public access to its own statewide court records system, which is similar to the federal courts' PACER portal.
Since 2017, Texas judges, court clerks and attorneys have been able to use re:SearchTX to search for and view court documents that were e-filed in any of the state's 254 counties. However, up until this point, lawyers were limited to viewing only cases in which they were attorneys of record.
Now, the public launch gives lawyers access to every case in the state, except for criminal cases.
Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Nathan Hecht, who's been using re:SearchTX for two years to check trial court records that appellate attorneys cite in their briefs, said it's saved his clerks from the cumbersome process of calling trial court clerks to request court documents.
"This way, you push a few buttons, and there it is," he said. "We are proud of the greater transparency. We want people generally to see what's going on in their courts. This just enhances that. You've been able to do that for years with the federal courts, but Texas is such a big state, and so diverse, it's been hard to get it done. But we are finally there."
Registering for an account to search for court cases is free, but viewing and downloading documents cost 10 cents per page, up to a $6 maximum. That money goes to the court clerk where the document originated. The system offers a free account, and premium and pro levels for monthly fees that come with additional searching, saving, organizing and case alerting functions.
There are some limits on the documents available in re:SearchTX. Lawyers can see filings back to January 2016, and the public can see records from November 2018. Anything that a party has e-filed in any court statewide will be there. However, unless that court has chosen to fully integrate its case management system with re:SearchTX, it won't have final orders and judgments, nor filings by unrepresented litigants who paper file directly with a court clerk.
Right now, among the state's 254 counties, only the courts in Burnet and Collin counties are fully integrated, while courts in Denton and Fort Bend counties are in the process of integrating. El Paso and Grayson County courts are planning to integrate with re:SearchTX, but no timeline has been established.
Tyler Technologies, the same company that runs eFileTexas, the statewide e-filing system that the Supreme Court requires lawyers to use, also powers re:SearchTX. The company runs similar systems in Georgia, Illinois and New Mexico.
"Tyler and the state of Texas share ambitious goals for expanding access to justice," said a statement by Mitchell Spence, senior vice president of eSolutions for Tyler's Courts & Justice Division. "Re:SearchTX helps the legal community easily access the information and documents they need to be successful."
Related stories:
Brace Yourselves, PACER-Like Systems Are Coming This Winter
Texas Lawyers Now Have Access to Online Court Record System That Might Eventually Resemble PACER
Texas Launches Its Own Version of PACER, But Only a Few Lawyers Will Have Access
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllExxonMobil Sues California AG Bonta, Environmental Groups for Advanced Recycling 'Smear Campaign'
Trending Stories
- 1OCR Issues 'Dear Colleagues' Letter Regarding AI in Medicine
- 2Corporate Litigator Joins BakerHostetler From Fish & Richardson
- 3E-Discovery Provider Casepoint Merges With Government Software Company OPEXUS
- 4How I Made Partner: 'Focus on Being the Best Advocate for Clients,' Says Lauren Reichardt of Cooley
- 5People in the News—Jan. 27, 2025—Barley Snyder
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250