Migrant Fathers Prepare to Sue Federal Government Over Separation From Their Children
The government "took children from their parents not in spite of the harm, but because of it, intending that the terror inflicted on these families would deter other families from migrating to the United States," said the fathers' claims.
August 30, 2019 at 04:45 PM
4 minute read
Two migrant fathers who were separated from their children under the Trump administration's family separation policy have taken the first step toward suing the administration.
The two men this week filed administrative claims alleging that the government separated thousands of children from their parents, although it knew the harm it was inflicting.
"It took children from their parents not in spite of the harm, but because of it, intending that the terror inflicted on these families would deter other families from migrating to the United States," said the claims, which gave notice of the fathers' federal tort claims with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the U.S. Department of Justice and other federal agencies.
In addition to these two fathers, the Southern Poverty Law Center, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit law firm, has partnered with Covington & Burling to file five other administrative claims for migrant parents and children who were separated at the border, according to the center's website.
"Thousands of children and parents will live with intense trauma the rest of their lives as a result of this policy, which the administration knew would leave indelible scars," said a statement by Michelle Lapointe, senior supervising attorney at the center.
Jay Carey, a partner in Covington & Burling in Washington, D.C., said that the fathers and children experienced permanent harm, and those responsible should be held accountable.
"A message must be sent to this Administration—which has acted in the name of the American people—that such cruelty will not be tolerated here or in any civilized society," he said in a statement.
The first father, whom the claim calls "J.D.G.," immigrated from Guatemala with his 11-year-old daughter, because his niece had been raped in their neighborhood, and he feared the perpetrator would rape his daughter, too. They entered the U.S. in Arizona, where they were detained. As the girl cried, they were separated from each other in May 2018. The father became ill with despair. He considered taking his own life, said the claim.
Although they were reunited in July 2018, the separation changed the girl, who wouldn't eat, insisted on remaining at her father's side at all times, acted sad and distracted and sometimes became combative and rebellious, according to the claim. The father struggles with feelings of guilt, as he replays the details of the separation, can't sleep well, and more.
The second father, "E.S.M.," also from Guatemala, was separated in May 2018 from his 11-year-old son in Arizona.
"It was a terrible scene, with both children and adults crying, and children begging their parents not to let the officials take them away," his claim said, noting the father was distraught and couldn't eat or sleep because officers knew nothing about his son.
In July 2018, the father and son were reunited in a Texas detention center. The son "told his father that he thought he was never [going] to come for him."
The boy is now afraid to be alone and worried when his father leaves the house, and seems distant, quiet and withdrawn, where he was a talkative kid before. The father struggles with fear that his son will be taken from him again, the claim said.
Both claims alleged that separating families violates the Constitution, the law and basic human decency.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readSpecial Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
4 minute read'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250