Migrant Fathers Prepare to Sue Federal Government Over Separation From Their Children
The government "took children from their parents not in spite of the harm, but because of it, intending that the terror inflicted on these families would deter other families from migrating to the United States," said the fathers' claims.
August 30, 2019 at 04:45 PM
4 minute read
Two migrant fathers who were separated from their children under the Trump administration's family separation policy have taken the first step toward suing the administration.
The two men this week filed administrative claims alleging that the government separated thousands of children from their parents, although it knew the harm it was inflicting.
"It took children from their parents not in spite of the harm, but because of it, intending that the terror inflicted on these families would deter other families from migrating to the United States," said the claims, which gave notice of the fathers' federal tort claims with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the U.S. Department of Justice and other federal agencies.
In addition to these two fathers, the Southern Poverty Law Center, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit law firm, has partnered with Covington & Burling to file five other administrative claims for migrant parents and children who were separated at the border, according to the center's website.
"Thousands of children and parents will live with intense trauma the rest of their lives as a result of this policy, which the administration knew would leave indelible scars," said a statement by Michelle Lapointe, senior supervising attorney at the center.
Jay Carey, a partner in Covington & Burling in Washington, D.C., said that the fathers and children experienced permanent harm, and those responsible should be held accountable.
"A message must be sent to this Administration—which has acted in the name of the American people—that such cruelty will not be tolerated here or in any civilized society," he said in a statement.
The first father, whom the claim calls "J.D.G.," immigrated from Guatemala with his 11-year-old daughter, because his niece had been raped in their neighborhood, and he feared the perpetrator would rape his daughter, too. They entered the U.S. in Arizona, where they were detained. As the girl cried, they were separated from each other in May 2018. The father became ill with despair. He considered taking his own life, said the claim.
Although they were reunited in July 2018, the separation changed the girl, who wouldn't eat, insisted on remaining at her father's side at all times, acted sad and distracted and sometimes became combative and rebellious, according to the claim. The father struggles with feelings of guilt, as he replays the details of the separation, can't sleep well, and more.
The second father, "E.S.M.," also from Guatemala, was separated in May 2018 from his 11-year-old son in Arizona.
"It was a terrible scene, with both children and adults crying, and children begging their parents not to let the officials take them away," his claim said, noting the father was distraught and couldn't eat or sleep because officers knew nothing about his son.
In July 2018, the father and son were reunited in a Texas detention center. The son "told his father that he thought he was never [going] to come for him."
The boy is now afraid to be alone and worried when his father leaves the house, and seems distant, quiet and withdrawn, where he was a talkative kid before. The father struggles with fear that his son will be taken from him again, the claim said.
Both claims alleged that separating families violates the Constitution, the law and basic human decency.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute read'Rapidly Closing Window': Progressive Groups Urge Senate Votes on Biden's Judicial Nominees
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Attorneys ‘On the Move’: Morrison Cohen Adds White Collar Partner; Corporate/Securities Partner Joins Olshan
- 2Jury Says $118M: Netlist Wins Another Patent Verdict Against Samsung
- 3Big Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace For Changes Under Trump
- 4Will England Accept that Digital Assets Are ‘Property’?
- 5Congress and Courts Are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250