As Clients Toughen Payment Terms, Texas Firms Continue to Collect
Industrywide, collections have slowed in the first half of 2019, but some regions including Texas have seen the opposite.
September 03, 2019 at 11:48 AM
5 minute read
Clients have lately taken more of a heavy-handed approach to minimizing legal costs, contributing to a longer collections cycle that developed during the first six months of this year, but some regions including Texas may be bucking that trend.
Citi Private Bank Law Firm Group noted the slowdown in collections industrywide in its report on the first half of 2019. The trend goes beyond clients delaying payment because of a question about a line item on a bill.
"Some firms talk of their clients unilaterally changing payment terms as a primary driver of the longer collection cycle," Citi advisers recently wrote in their first-half report. The report noted that e-billing systems and "greater scrutiny" overall on invoices has led to less money coming in during the first half of 2019.
Marcie Borgal Shunk, president and founder of The Tilt Institute, said it's true that legal departments seem to have been tougher lately in managing outside counsel billing by looking hard at bills to ensure that firms are following their guidelines.
"Unfortunately, there are law firms that don't do a very good job of managing it. Each client has a unique set of guidelines," Shunk said.
As to the Citi suggestion that clients are changing payment terms, Shunk said that may be a further step as clients become more proactive managers of their outside counsel and legal spend.
"They have the buying power," she said.
Companies typically revise or revisit their outside counsel guidelines on a yearly basis, which may lead to new obligations and rules for outside counsel, she said.
According to the Citi report, which was based on survey responses from 161 firms around the country, the collection cycle lengthened by 1.6 percent for the industry as a whole during the first six months of 2019. In Texas, by contrast, the cycle shortened by 3.8% at the 11 Texas firms in the survey. Pennsylvania law firms also saw the collections cycle shorten slightly, by 0.8%.
|Collections: Bigger in Texas
Leaders of two Texas firms reported that they are not seeing any slowdown in collections.
"We haven't really seen any pressure on payments at all," said Mark Sloan, managing partner of Thompson & Knight, which is based in Dallas.
Lee Kaplan, a founding partner of litigation boutique Smyser Kaplan & Veselka of Houston, said his firm has been extremely busy this year, and collections are on the same pace as last year or even ahead of 2018.
He said he has not noticed any situation lately involving a client wanting to change payment terms. He does recall, however, that during the Great Recession, some clients moved to a 90-day pay cycle.
Kaplan also recalled one extraordinary instance around late 2017, when a client was having financial difficulties and said that, if the law firm didn't reduce each lawyer's billing rate by 25%, it would take its files elsewhere. Kaplan said the firm's response was to continue to work for the client, but only because it was a limited discrete matter that did not materially result in a financial hit.
"That's pretty unusual," he said of that situation.
In general, according to Kaplan, institutional clients agree to pay at around 60 days—some later, some earlier—and the firm generally knows what it's getting into when it begins a representation.
Kaplan said most clients fulfill their side of the bargain, except when there might be a question on an bill that delays payment, or when a client "gets in a pickle" and asks for some relief.
|Growing Pain?
Lisa Smith, a consultant at Fairfax Associates in Washington, D.C., said questions on electronic bills can indeed lead to payment delays. That's not a new trend, but it happens, Smith said.
"One good practice is to make sure the submission on electronic billing is accurate the first time. Firms have found, if they spend more time on the front end, it gets into the payment system faster," she said, noting that another best practice is to move collections out of the hands of the responsible partner to the firm's collections experts.
Smith said that, while some clients do take advantage of their firms, sometimes firms are just not that aggressive in collecting money.
Shunk said slower pay is perhaps less of a trend than a growing pain, as law firms adapt to changing norms within legal departments looking to streamline.
"As more clients bring in professionals and put attention to these details, law firms will adjust, and as they adjust [collection cycles] will go back down," she said.
|Read More
Citi Survey: Homegrown Texas Firms Outperform Industry in Key Areas
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAkin, Baker Botts, Vinson & Elkins Are First Texas Big Law Firms to Match Milbank Bonuses
4 minute readAnticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readRevenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250