Litigation Department of the Year - General Litigation (midsize): Susman Godfrey
Susman Godfrey obtained what appears to be the largest jury verdict handed down in Texas in 2018: In March of last year, the firm obtained a $706.2…
September 03, 2019 at 01:00 AM
4 minute read
Susman Godfrey obtained what appears to be the largest jury verdict handed down in Texas in 2018: In March of last year, the firm obtained a $706.2 million verdict for its client HouseCanary in a misappropriation of trade secret and breach of contract case related to HouseCanary's valuation, appraisal and real estate analytics technology. Following a seven-week trial, a jury found unanimously in favor of HouseCanary and against Title Source, an affiliate of Quicken Loans. Then, in October 2018, a judge finalized the award by adding prejudgment interest and attorney fees, bringing the total to nearly $740 million. The verdict appeared at number 4 on Texas Lawyer affiliate The National Law Journal's "Top 100 Verdicts of 2018″ list.
Last June, the firm also obtained a $25.3 million award in Los Angeles state court for its client Steven Lamar in a case against Beats, Dr. Dre and Jimmy Iovine alleging the defendants breached a written royalty agreement related to the design of the popular Beats headphones.
The firm in 2018 also continued to take on weighty issues on a pro bono basis. In O'Donnell v. Harris County, Susman Godfrey represented a class of indigent arrestees, challenging the system of secured money bail for misdemeanor arrestees in Harris County. In February 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit sided with the firm and its clients, upholding a landmark 2017 ruling by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas that found the Harris County bail system was unconstitutional and disproportionately affected indigent people.
The following responses were provided by Houston-based Susman Godfrey partner Ryan Caughey.
A prospective client in crisis calls and asks why your team should be retained—what is your answer?
For more than 40 years, Susman Godfrey has focused its nationally recognized practice on just one thing: high-stakes commercial trial litigation. Plaintiffs and defendants call onSusman Godfrey to handle their most significant and complex matters. And when called,Susman Godfrey deploys teams of the nation's highest qualified and most experienced litigators. Nearly every Susman Godfrey attorney has completed a federal judicial clerkship, and Susman Godfrey attorneys at all levels of seniority go to trial and handle critical stand-up tasks. And the firm's results speak for itself. The firm has won some of the largest verdicts in the United States—billions of dollars overall for plaintiffs—and has been equally successful on the defense side.
It's a challenging litigation market, with increasing competition not only from other law firms but from alternative legal services providers. From a business perspective, what does it take for a litigation team to succeed in this environment?
Commercial litigation firms must provide value to their clients. How can they do that? Foremost, a litigation firm must provide exceptional service and results. There is nothing more costly than ineffective legal representation. Susman Godfrey provides its clients with unparalleled service: the firm hires the best of the best, deploys them on the most complex and vexing matters, and prepares every case as if it will be tried to verdict. AndSusman Godfrey does it in a cost-effective way. In the past several years, commercial clients have focused more on alternative fee arrangements as a superior way to pay for legal services. Alternative fee arrangements have been a halmark of Susman Godfrey's business for nearly four decades. No firm has more experience in working with clients to tailor the fee arrangement to meet the economic needs of the client, and to align the client's interests with those of its outside counsel.
An awards ceremony will be held on Sept. 18 at the Belo Mansion in Dallas. The Attorney of the Year award winner will be announced at the ceremony.
Click here for booking information. For information about sponsoring the event, contact Andre Sutton at 757-721-9020 or email [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTexas Legal Awards 2024: Attorney of the Year, Law Firm of the Year Announced
Litigation Departments of the Year, Class Action Winner: Sidley Austin
Texas Legal Awards: Q&As With Litigation Departments of the Year, General Litigation Finalists
Real Estate Attorney of the Year Finalist: John T. Duncan III
Trending Stories
- 1Litera Acquires Document Automation Startup Offices & Dragons
- 2Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
- 3Transforming Dispute Processes in Law: The Impact of Large Language Models
- 4Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
- 5Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250