Why Lawyers Get Sued for Malpractice and How to Prevent It
Common Causes of Legal Malpractice Lawsuits
September 03, 2019 at 01:00 AM
6 minute read
The American Bar Association reports that four out of five lawyers will get sued for malpractice at some point in their career. Seventy percent of malpractice claims are filed against small firms of one to five lawyers.
In terms of damaging a lawyer's reputation, requiring extra work hours, and incurring costly defense expenses, there are few things more daunting than being sued for legal malpractice.
Despite the obvious negatives of being targeted by a client, the same types of conduct account for most malpractice allegations year after year. Similarly, attorneys who handle a select few areas of law are more likely to face a malpractice claim compared to their peers.
Being aware of the common reasons clients decide to sue their lawyers and the areas of practice that represent potential minefields are just two ways attorneys can protect against being the subject of a malpractice lawsuit.
Who Gets Sued for Legal Malpractice?
Every year, the Virginia-based insurance brokerage and risk management firm Ames & Gough publishes a survey of professional liability insurance companies that, combined, provided insurance to roughly 80 percent of the firms listed in the Am Law 200.
The firm's 9th annual report released in 2018 found that, although claim frequency remained stable over the prior year, claim severity rose. All nine surveyed insurance carriers reported claims reserved at, or in excess of, $500,000, with five insurers reporting at least 21 such claims. Further, five carriers reported paying claims of $50 million or more, including two settlements that totaled in excess of $250 million.
As reported by the surveyed insurers, Ames & Gough identified four practice areas that account for nearly all the legal malpractice lawsuits filed during 2018, which has been consistent since the survey began: Business Transactions (63 percent); Trusts & Estates (55 percent); Corporate & Securities (45 percent); and Real Estate (45 percent).
Additionally, according to the American Bar Association, plaintiff's personal injury firms are at a higher risk as are attorneys practicing IP law and the newly emerging area of loan modification.
Most Common Legal Malpractice Claims
Once again, the Ames & Gough survey identified real and perceived conflicts of interest as the leading legal malpractice claim last year. In fact, conflicts have topped the list every year the survey has been conducted.
Many of the conflict problems are attributed to lateral hires or "merged" attorneys who allegedly are not properly trained or supervised. The conflict issue also is blamed on firms that fail to properly screen incoming attorneys to make sure their prior work does not put them in conflict with existing client matters.
Other common causes of legal malpractice lawsuits include:
- Failure to know or properly apply substantive law
- Missing statute of limitations
- Failing to calendar deadlines
- Missing a crucial filing date
- Inadequate investigation or fact discovery
- Administrative errors
- Intentional wrongdoing
- Failure to follow client instructions
- Failure to properly obtain client consent
In its 2017 survey, Ames & Gough reported that the costs of defending malpractice claims continued to rise with two of the insurers reporting average malpractice defense costs at more than $500,000 while the remaining seven companies said they averaged between $50,000 and $500,000. In other words, getting sued for malpractice is not an inexpensive proposition.
How to Prevent a Legal Malpractice Lawsuit
Since the causes of legal malpractice are readily identifiable, there are clear ways to reduce the risk of being sued by a client.
On the conflicts front, firms need to be hyper-vigilant when bringing in new attorneys to help lessen the chances that a client will claim a real or perceived conflict. This is especially true for law firms in Texas based on the recent influx of out-of-state firms and lawyers who have decided to set up shop in the Lone Star State.
Attorneys who are accused of failing to properly apply substantive law often are working in areas outside their expertise for one reason or the other. Unfortunately, some lawyers decide to "wing it" to help satisfy a client's immediate needs only to later find out that they were in over their heads. All told, it is much safer and better for the lawyer to refer a matter to another law firm with more expertise instead of trying to hold on to the work. This is a common problem for small firms trying to be a "one-stop shop" for their clients.
Another common thread in malpractice claims can be tied to poor communication with clients. If a client asks for information about their case, every law firm should make a good faith effort to respond in a timely manner. Ignoring a "pestering" client is a recipe for a grievance and potentially a legal malpractice lawsuit.
Although some lawyers have trouble admitting their mistakes, doing so can diffuse a potential malpractice claim. Owning up to a mistake and explaining what can be done to resolve the issue is not only ethically the right thing to do, it also shows clients that their attorneys are human and willing to resolve whatever problem their mistake caused.
Best practice is for a firm to immediately contact their malpractice insurer whenever they become aware of a possible claim. That does not mean waiting until a lawsuit is filed with a request for damages, which can only prolong the process. Most insurers will allow the filing of a "notice of circumstance," which can help ensure that firms are covered in the event of an actual malpractice lawsuit.
No one wants to be sued for legal malpractice. It is costly, time-consuming, and potentially damaging in terms of reputation and legal expenses. Knowing the rules and the areas that are most likely to result in a claim are the best tools to keep it from happening.
Brad Jackson is the founder of The Law Offices of Brad Jackson in Dallas. Jackson is Board Certified in Civil Trial Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. He and fellow firm attorney Cheryl L. Mann regularly represent lawyers, law firms and individuals in legal malpractice lawsuits.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom Hospital Bed to Legal Insights: Lessons in Life, Law, and Lawyering
6 minute readNondisparagement Clauses in Divorce: Balancing Family Harmony and Free Speech
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Choice-of-Law Issues as the UCC 2022 Amendments Come into Effect
- 2Six Benefits of Taking an Opposing Medical Expert’s Deposition
- 3Ex-Prosecutor’s Trial Ends as Judge Throws Out Her Felony Indictment in Ahmaud Arbery Death Case
- 4Conversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue
- 5Trump Taps McKinsey CLO Pierre Gentin for Commerce Department GC
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250