Texas Lawyers Fielding More Calls From Child Sex Abuse Survivors Thanks to New Law
"I do expect more lawsuits, because we have talked to people in the past who fell outside of the statute of limitations, who fall within it now," said Brent Walker, partner in Aldous \ Walker in Dallas.
September 04, 2019 at 10:18 AM
4 minute read
Texas personal injury attorneys representing child sexual abuse victims are getting more calls from clients because of a new law that doubled their statute of limitations.
Other states, including New York and New Jersey, recently passed laws to permit a window of time in which child sex abuse survivors, regardless of whether their abuse happened six or 60 years ago, could sue their abusers and any institutions that enabled the abuse. Those states have been flooded with personal injury lawsuits. There might also be a wave of litigation in Texas, but because the state's new law isn't as lenient, the impact won't be as drastic.
House Bill 3809, effective Sept. 1, extended the statute of limitations from 15 years to 30 years for bringing personal injury claims related to six specific penal code violations involving sexual assault or sex trafficking of a child. HB 3809 is not retroactive. It will only apply to claims that accrue on or after Sept. 1, or to claims that accrued earlier, where the statute of limitations in effect at that time has not yet run.
Brent Walker, who represents survivors as a partner in Aldous \ Walker in Dallas, said that HB 3809 is a good step, but it didn't go far enough.
"It's very often the case that minors repress the memories, so they don't even know what happened to them until much later in life. It's very hard, if not impossible, to come forward and file a case within a statute of limitations," he said. "But I do expect more lawsuits, because we have talked to people in the past who fell outside of the statute of limitations, who fall within it now."
Other attorneys agree.
The Texas law will not bring justice for adults who experienced sexual abuse in their childhoods, according to Michelle Simpson Tuegel, a Dallas solo practitioner who has represented Boy Scout sex abuse survivors, and sex abuse victims of Larry Nassar, the convicted ex-doctor of USA Gymnastics and Michigan State University.
Simpson Tuegel said HB 3809 won't bring a rush of cases, like in New York or New Jersey, because doesn't apply retroactively.
"Arguably, it applies to someone who is not an adult yet, because their statute still has not run. It doesn't start running until you're of the age of maturity," she said.
She said people who followed media coverage about the bill have already been calling her law office seeking representation, telling stories of being abused in the Boy Scouts or the Catholic Church.
"Some of them I can do something for now—and some I can't," Simpson Tuegel said.
Still, when lawmakers doubled the statute of limitations, it sent a message to survivors that they should report sex abuse and take legal action, said an email by McKool Smith principal Lauren Varnado of Houston.
Varnado said she expects to see cases against religious organizations, schools, hospitals and youth programs.
"HB 3809 will likely open the floodgates for child sex abuse lawsuits against major institutions in Texas, similar to the hundreds of sex abuse cases that have been filed against the Catholic Church and the Boy Scouts of America following the enactment of similar laws in other states," Varnado said. "Insurance companies are already preparing for a flood of sex abuse litigation. At least two major U.S. insurers have announced they are adding to their reserves due to uncertainty about sexual-abuse liabilities."
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAdvising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
4 minute readHomegrown Texas Law Firms Expanded Outside the Lone Star State in 2024 As Out-of-State Firms Moved In
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250