#MeToo Backlash Is Not Going Away
The Mike Pence rule is on its way to becoming the standard in the American workplace.
September 05, 2019 at 02:46 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Let us not underestimate the wisdom of Mike Pence. Not only can he teach us about the essential art of sucking up (he made his boss very happy recently by staying at a Trump property in Ireland, even though it added hours of travel to his meeting place), he's the oracle of gender relations in the workplace.
You remember the Mike Pence rule, right? You know all that stuff about how Pence avoids being alone with a woman and how he never attends social events where alcohol is served without his wife? Oh, how quaint and silly was that?
Well, trivialize it at your peril, because the Pence rule is becoming the standard in the American workplace. According to a new study in the Harvard Business Review (the authors are Leanne Atwater, Allison Tringale, Rachel Sturm, Scott Taylor and Phillip Braddy), not only is the #MeToo backlash not quieting down, it's gotten worse in the last year.
Here are two depressing highlights, comparing 2019 with 2018 responses, based on data from 152 men and 303 women in a range of industries:
- 19% of men were reluctant to hire attractive women; in 2018, it was 16%.
- 21% of men were reluctant to hire women for jobs involving close interpersonal interactions such as travel; in 2018, it was 15%.
So not to make you feel you're living in 1965, there was some progress. For instance, in 2019, only 27% of men said they avoided one-on-one meetings with female colleagues; in 2018, it was a whopping 41%. But before you cheer that change, let this sink in: having 27% of men fearing being alone with a woman in a work context still stinks. Considering it's 2019, it's frick'n unbelievable.
Now, you might think that the legal profession is more advanced. Well, don't be so sure. Last fall, Working Mother magazine and the ABA Journal published a study with similar results: Most male lawyers—56%—said they were nervous about one-on-one interactions with women at work and the charges of impropriety that might result.
But let's go back to the study published in HBR. What intrigued (and disturbed) me were the responses from women. The 2018 women responses (the women's 2019 responses have not come out) show how much women have internalized and accepted the #MeToo backlash—sometimes even more than men:
- 15% of women said that they'd hesitate about hiring women for jobs that require close interactions with men, such as travel (same rate for men that year).
- 43% of women said that the more women who come forward about sexual harassment, the more likely it will be that men blame women for the problem, while only 30% of men thought so.
- 44% of women agreed that men will more likely exclude women from social interactions, while only 22% of men thought so.
- 57% of women said men will be more reluctant to have one-on-one meeting with women alone, while only 41% of men thought so.
And here's the big bummer: 11% of women said they'd be reluctant to hire attractive women! So much for sisterhood!
It's almost as if women are unwittingly participants of the #MeToo backlash. If we expect the worst—that there's hell to pay—are we helping to make it a self-fulfilling prophecy?
I don't know what the solution to the #MeToo backlash is, except to ride it out and press on.
In the meantime, though, may I make one simple suggestion? Let's assume there will always be Mike Pences out there, but let's not assume that they rule the world. OK?
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNondisparagement Clauses in Divorce: Balancing Family Harmony and Free Speech
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1John Deere Annual Meeting Offers Peek Into DEI Strife That Looms for Companies Nationwide
- 2Why Associates in This Growing Legal Market Are Leaving Their Firms
- 3Visa's Defense of DOJ Antitrust Case Suffers Setback After Court Denies Motion to Dismiss
- 4Greenberg Traurig Combines Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate Groups, Anticipating Uptick in Demand
- 5Trump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250