'Can Y'all Play Nice?' Judge Asks Counsel in Case of Lawyer Who Slapped Another Attorney
"Can y'all play nice or do I have to attend these depositions? I don't mind coming down there if I need to, or you can do them here," said 127th District Judge R.K. Sandill of Harris County.
September 10, 2019 at 12:31 PM
4 minute read
Houston attorney Ronny Krist has already received a ticket for slapping Greg Enos—who's representing a plaintiff suing Krist—just before a deposition. Now the incident, caught on camera, has reached the courthouse in the form of a discovery dispute.
"Can y'all play nice, or do I have to attend these depositions?" 127th District Judge R.K. Sandill of Harris County, Texas, asked during a telephone hearing on Tuesday. "I don't mind coming down there if I need to, or you can do them here."
Both sides declined the judge's offer to attend the depositions to ensure they "play nice." Sandill also suggested that Enos could take Krist's deposition over Skype or another video conferencing system, rather than in person.
The judge told the attorneys that the defendants must fully comply with the plaintiff's production requests within 10 days, and that he wants the depositions completed within 30 days. He also said the parties must notify the court by Sept. 10 about the dates they have scheduled the depositions, or else he would issue an order to compel the depositions for a certain date.
Enos, owner of The Enos Law Firm in Webster, was representing Jessica Vickery, who is suing Krist and two other Houston attorneys over a 45 percent contingent attorney fee they charged on annuity payments her mother won in a 1994 divorce case against Baytown lawyer Glenn Vickery.
Krist's attorneys were scheduled to take Jessica Vickery's deposition Aug. 21, and Krist came along to listen. A security camera in Enos' law firm recorded Krist slapping Enos across the face. According to an Aug. 21 incident report by the Webster Police Department, police charged Krist with class C misdemeanor assault by contact, which carries a maximum fine of $500 and no jail time.
Enos notified the court about the assault in an Aug. 30 letter to Sandill, which was filed in the case. He argued that the court should step in to make orders about Krist's conduct, bar him from attending Vickery's deposition, and order Krist's own deposition to occur at the courthouse, which has heightened security. Enos told the court the defendants haven't fully complied with production requests, nor agreed to schedule depositions of the defendants.
In response, Scott Krist filed a letter with the court Sept. 6 that said the parties have resolved the discovery disputes that Vickery raised and the court doesn't need to intervene. Among other things, the defendants agreed that Ronny Krist won't attend any depositions in the case aside from his own. He wrote that when Ronny Krist is deposed, it will take place at The Krist Law Firm. If Enos is afraid, he should notify the Webster Police Department before the deposition.
'Pitiful old man'
Although they agreed to behave in depositions, the attorneys for both sides have lobbed accusations of unprofessional behavior behind the scenes.
Scott Krist's letter said that from the start of the case, Enos has been disrespectful to Ronny Krist. But Enos said that when Krist arrived at his law office on Aug. 21, Krist threatened to "kick my ass," to which Enos replied, "I would like to see that happen."
That's when Krist slapped Enos.
After the assault on Aug. 21, Enos publicized the incident online and in the media, the letter said. Enos wrote on his blog that just before Ronny Krist slapped him, "I did tell this pitiful old man that I would like to see that happen."
Scott Krist wrote, "Plaintiffs counsel decided to engage in school-yard taunts and name calling. This is the tone and behavior by plaintiff's counsel that has led to the unfortunate events in this case."
He asked the court to admonish Enos to behave professionally.
But on the other side, Enos' letter said that Scott Krist has been unprofessional when responding to emails about the discovery disputes. For example, he claimed in one response, Scott Krist wrote, "Nerd, we'll have documents to you next week upon my return from vacation. Further, only an idiot would grant credence to your neophyte construction of the rules. Now go back and sit in the corner."
Related story:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome', DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250