How 3 Texas Lawyers Climbed to the Peak of Their Profession
Texas Lawyer has reviewed the applications that Jimmy Blacklock, Brett Busby and Jane Bland submitted to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott to apply for an appointment to the Texas Supreme Court.
September 11, 2019 at 01:10 PM
7 minute read
Top law schools, prestigious judicial clerkships and Big-Law pedigree are commonalities among three Texas Supreme Court justices that Gov. Greg Abbott has appointed to fill vacancies in recent years.
Other similarities emerge in Justices Jimmy Blacklock, Brett Busby and Jane Bland's conservative judicial philosophies and Republican political leanings, based on a review of the applications they submitted to the governor's office to be considered for judicial appointments.
Texas Lawyer obtained the judicial applications from Abbott's office through a Texas Public Information Act request.
"If I think about unifying themes about these three appointments, in general, you could say they are proven, hardworking, respected, conservative jurists or lawyers in the state of Texas," said appellate litigator Lisa Hobbs, founding member in Kuhn Hobbs in Austin.
"He's looking for people he trusts," Hobbs added about Abbott. "He doesn't want any surprises."
|Climbing the ladder
Lawyers looking for a coveted appointment to the high court might need to think about it very early, arranging their career trajectory just right.
For example, these three appointees all graduated from top law schools and scored competitive, prestigious judicial clerkships on federal appellate courts. Next, big law awaited them.
|Applications at a glance
|- Appointed in January 2018 to replace former Justice Don Willett
- Yale Law School, 2005
- Clerkship on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Big law experience at Vinson & Elkins
- Executive position in Texas Office of the Attorney General
- General counsel for Texas Gov. Greg Abbott
- Appointed in February to replace retiring Justice Phil Johnson
- Columbia University School of Law, 1998
- Clerkships for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Byron R. White, who retired, and then Justice John Paul Stevens
- Big law experience at Mayer Brown and Bracewell & Giuliani
- Justice on Houston's 14th Court of Appeals, 2012 to 2018
- Appointed in August to replace Justice Jeff Brown
- University of Texas School of Law, 1990
- Clerkship on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Big law experience at Baker Botts
- Judge of Harris County's 281st District Court, 1997 to 2003
- Justice on Houston's First Court of Appeals, 2003 to 2018
The next rung on the ladder for both Busby and Bland took them to state benches. Yet both lost reelection as appellate justices in Houston during the November 2018 election, when a Democratic sweep unseated Republican jurists across Texas' major metro areas.
Hobbs, who closely observes the Supreme Court and practices there, said that these credentials give objective factors for the governor to measure.
"These are qualified individuals," she said. "They have backgrounds that lend themselves to how to write opinions, how to cite cases, how to analyze the law."
Blacklock differs from the others: He gravitated toward lawyering in the state's executive branch. While he had no judicial experience before his appointment, he had a connection to Abbott in the attorney general's office, when Abbott served there, and in the governor's office.
Hobbs said she isn't surprised that Abbott picked someone he knows well, whom he can trust. Hobbs added that she values diversity in judges among traditional demographic lines but also in work experience.
"Diversity in public service—in other branches of government—is just as important," Hobbs explained.
Being a Republican is key to winning an appointment to the Texas Supreme Court. Hobbs noted that all Republican governors pick Republican judges, so it's no surprise that Blacklock, Busby and Bland all have histories in the party.
Blacklock has been active in past years in Republican Party politics in Travis County, which includes Austin. In the attorney general's office, he handled cases over abortion regulations, and same-sex divorce. He drafted amicus briefs for Abbott's office about gun rights, immigration and medicare expansion.
Prior to taking the bench, Busby was active in Republican Party politics at the county, state and national levels. Back then, he gave pro bono representation to the conservative nonprofits First Liberty Institute and Texas Eagle Forum. He ran for election to the 14th Court of Appeals as a Republican.
As an elected judge since 1997, Bland has less of a track record as a Republican politico, although she always ran for election as a Republican.
Bland's answers to the judicial questionnaire in her application did indicate a conservative judicial approach.
"The role of a judge is to interpret the law as written. Respecting settled interpretations of the law when the facts of two cases are materially the same brings equality and certainty to citizens' rights and obligations under the law," she wrote.
More conservative views came out in the judicial questionnaires for Blacklock and Busby.
Busby wrote that the judge he most admires is former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia because of his "disciplined development of the interpretive methods of textualism and original public meaning."
Blacklock, when asked which case he thought the U.S. Supreme Court decided wrongly, said Roe v. Wade.
"It is not based on the application of neutral legal principles external to the judges," he wrote.
Blacklock declined to comment for this article, and Busby and Bland didn't return multiple messages seeking comment.
|Winning the appointment
Only three of the high court's nine justices first won their seat by election: Chief Justice Nathan Hecht and Justices Paul Green and John Devine. Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry appointed Justices Eva Guzman, Debra Lehrmann, Jeff Boyd and Jeff Brown, who is now leaving for the federal bench. Bland is Abbott's third appointment to the high court.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEven With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute read'Courts Do Get It Wrong': Legal Experts Discuss State-Law Certification Pros and Cons
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250