Texas Lawyers Score $50 Million Settlement in Clean Water Act Case
Plaintiffs counsel said the Clean Water Act settlement may be the largest ever in the nation.
October 16, 2019 at 03:56 PM
5 minute read
A team of attorneys working alongside Texas RioGrande Legal Aid has scored a $50 million settlement and $3 million in attorney fees from a plastics company that's polluted coastal bays off the Gulf of Mexico for years.
The plaintiffs, San Antonio Bay Estuarine Waterkeeper, a community group that protects the bays, and one of its leaders, Diane Wilson, and defendant Formosa Plastics Corp. entered the settlement Tuesday and submitted their consent decree to the federal government for review. Formosa has also promised to pay future attorney fees for the life of the consent decree.
"The conditions agreed to in this settlement demonstrate Formosa's commitment to manufacturing our products in a safe and environmentally friendly manner," said a statement by Formosa USA executive vice president Ken Mounger.
The $50 million Clean Water Act settlement may be the largest in the nation, said Amy Johnson, lead counsel for the plaintiffs. The highest she's seen previously was $10 million, said Johnson, an environmental law solo practitioner who has served as a paid consulting attorney at Texas RioGrande Legal Aid for five years.
She said it's very significant that Formosa agreed to bring its plastics discharges down to zero in the future.
"The mitigation that will come back to the community is huge," Johnson added.
Texas RioGrande Legal Aid spearheaded the case after learning about Formosa's pollution problem while it was surveying the area about its legal needs, said Erin Gaines, staff attorney for environmental justice at Texas RioGrande Legal Aid in Austin. Most legal aid providers represent low-income individuals with single-case civil matters, and it's rare for legal aid providers to handle massive environmental justice cases. But Texas RioGrande Legal Aid is one of the few in the country that's tackled environmental work, starting with fights for poor Texans living in colonias to get safe drinking and wastewater systems, Gaines said. She said the organization has grown its environmental law practice to meet a need it saw within the community.
The settlement comes after the plaintiffs won a court ruling in June that found Formosa was liable for widespread plastics pollution, and should be sanctioned for past violations, subjected to injunctive relief to stop future pollution. Formosa was also ordered to pay attorney fees. The parties were preparing for the second hearing in the bifurcated trial, which would have determine the remedy, when the settlement was reached.
Formosa promised in the consent decree to clean up its past pollution, and agreed to take steps to eliminate the discharge of plastics from its Point Comfort plant within the next three years.
The $50 million settlement, due in installments over the next five years, will benefit the environment and community surrounding Lavaca and Matagorda bays, which are adjacent to the coastal communities of Point Comfort and Port Lavaca. Formosa's plant in Point Comfort was the source the plastic pellets, called "nurdles," that polluted the bay systems. Nurdles are the raw material from which most plastic goods are manufactured.
Nearly $20 million will fund a nonprofit effort to create a fishing cooperative to revitalize marine ecosystems and boost the area's fishing, shrimping and oystering industries, which declined partially because of the pollution. Calhoun County will receive $12 million to develop a new park and to restore one beach where nurdles were found. Other funds will go to various nonprofits to establish outdoor and environmental education programs for children, a "Nurdle Patrol" to monitor the bays for pollution, and grant awards to people or groups to conduct conservation projects, environmental research, and habitat restoration.
Other attorneys on the plaintiffs team are David Frederick, partner in Frederick, Perales, Allmon & Rockwell in Austin, also an adjunct professor and research fellow at the University of Texas School of Law's environmental clinic; and David Bright, of counsel in Sico Hoelscher Harris in Corpus Christi.
"Our clients have been working on these issues and going out there almost daily for years, and bringing up these issues to state agencies, federal agencies, to government officials, and others," Gaines said. "They really feel like this is a turning point in terms of Formosa paying for the past pollution and all of that, but also, holding them more accountable moving forward."
Kelly Hart & Hallman partner Steve Ravel of Austin, who represented Formosa, declined to comment.
Read the settlement:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLennox Hires 12-Year Company Veteran as CLO, Bucking Hire-From-Outside Trend
3 minute read'Strong' Legal Theory or 'Oxymoron'? Experts Eye FTC Antitrust Suit Against Mattress Merger
5 minute readThis Judge Hoped to Be Reversed: Good News for Plaintiffs in Asbestos MDL
4 minute readSenior American Airlines Attorney Lands Back at Kimberly-Clark, This Time as GC
Trending Stories
- 1US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 2Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 3McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
- 4Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
- 5Schools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250