Corporate Execs Expect Less M&A in 2020, Dykema Survey Finds
Executives who participated in Dykema Gossett's 15th annual M&A Outlook Survey said trade tensions with China and U.S. political uncertainty are two biggest threats to dealmaking activity over the next 12 months.
November 07, 2019 at 07:00 AM
4 minute read
Corporate executives are much less bullish about the U.S. M&A market when forecasting for the coming year than they were about 2019, a Dykema Gossett survey finds.
A third of the 200 corporate executives who participated in Dykema Gossett's 15th annual M&A Outlook Survey have a positive view about U.S. dealmaking over the next 12 months, compared with two-thirds who had a positive outlook in last year's survey.
Nearly a third of the executives, 32%, are pessimistic about the U.S. M&A market over the next year. Only 15% were pessimistic about the market a year ago.
The results may not be surprising, considering nearly half of the respondents said they think a recession is "at least somewhat likely" over the next 12 months.
"It's been a bull market and there's been an incredible wave of M&A. Everybody expected at some point the party would have to end," said Jeffrey Gifford, a Dykema partner in San Antonio who worked on the survey.
The two greatest threats to M&A activity over the next 12 months are trade tensions with China and U.S. political uncertainty, according to the survey of executives, including CEOs and CFOs, which was made public on Thursday. The survey was conducted in September and October.
While a total of 43% of executives in the survey see trade tensions with China as a challenge for M&A over the next year, they also expect that China will be the country where the most outbound M&A activity will be concentrated over the next few months. After China, the executives expect the most outbound M&A in Europe, Canada and Japan.
In contrast, last year, the executives surveyed forecasted outbound M&A in Europe, Central and South America, Mexico and Canada. China wasn't in that mix.
As for political uncertainty, 38% of the executives predicted that next year's presidential elections would have a negative effect on U.S. M&A. According to the survey, one respondent noted that M&A "paused" in 2016 because of the presidential election. Others expressed worry that a Trump loss would undo the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which they believe has spurred M&A activity.
The executives also said Brexit and reforms that limited foreign investment in the U.S. have delayed deals this year. According to the survey, the executives want Congress to focus on issues such as free trade, immigration, tax reform, the minimum wage, deficit spending and deregulation.
When considering their own companies, the executives said they are less likely to become involved in acquisitions, joint ventures or dispositions over the next 12 months than they have been over the last year. And 58% expect M&A activity involving privately owned businesses to increase over the next year, while last year 82% had that expectation.
Like last year, the executives expect to see the most deals in the automotive, health care, energy, consumer products and technology industries. Energy dropped to the third spot in that list, down from second last year.
2019 has not been a particularly strong year for energy M&A in Texas, which has affected the volume and mix of work handled by Texas lawyers who work in the energy sector. According to oil and gas analytics firm Enverus, the dollar value of energy M&A through the third quarter of 2019 totals $85 billion, a few million dollars more than the total for all of 2018. But that value is skewed by one megadeal: Occidental Petroleum Corp.'s acquisition of Anadarko Petroleum Corp. in August, which was valued at about $55 billion.
Gifford, head of Dykema's corporate finance practice group, said the 2019 survey results will help lawyers and firms focus on the future.
"It's going to help me as I develop my own plan for next year, [determine] which of my clients I will be talking to, which industries to be focused on," he said.
Driving deals in the small and midsize market, Gifford said, is the reality many family business owners are now facing: the decision of whether to transition leadership to the next generation, or plan an exit strategy.
Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJCPenney Seeks Return of More Than $1.1M From Jackson Walker For Bankruptcy Work
3 minute readEx-Appellate Court Judges Launch Boutique Focused on Plaintiffs Appeals
2 minute readO'Melveny, White & Case, Skadden Beef Up in Texas With Energy, Real Estate Lateral Partner Hires
5 minute readChamberlain Hrdlicka Taps a New Leader as Firm Follows Succession Planning Path
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250