Tech Company Behind EFileTexas Hit With Patent-Infringement Claim
Tyler Technologies Inc., the company that operates e-filing systems in Texas, Georgia, California, Florida and 17 other states, was sued for patent infringement by a company that's hit 17 other companies with lawsuits since 2018.
November 12, 2019 at 01:50 PM
4 minute read
The Plano-based company that runs court document systems in Texas, Georgia, Florida and California was hit with a patent infringement lawsuit by a company that's sued at least 17 others since 2018.
The lawsuit by Akoloutheo LLC, a Frisco-based company run by a sole operator, Rochelle Burns, takes issue with Tyler Technology Inc.'s software applications, dataXchange and Tyler Content Manager, which allow the public to search for and retrieve case information, documents and images stored in the cloud.
Texas has contracted with Tyler since 2012 to use its Odyssey software to operate EFileTexas.gov, the statewide electronic filing system. Since 2017, Tyler has provided the tech behind re:SearchTX, which is the state's court record search and retrieval system, similar to the federal courts' PACER.gov system. Tyler also services courts and justice systems in 21 other states, including Georgia and California and multiple counties in Florida, according to a company brochure.
Tyler's software allegedly infringes on Akoloutheo's patent, issued in 2008, for a method and system that processes transactions between information services and applications, according to the Nov. 11 complaint in Akoloutheo v. Tyler Technologies Inc., filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Sherman. The plaintiff is seeking a judgment that says Tyler has infringed on its patent, a permanent injunction to stop the alleged infringement, and damages, costs, expenses pre- and postjudgment interest and attorney fees.
Tyler spokeswoman Nina Minney declined to comment.
"Tyler has not been served with the referenced lawsuit," she said.
According to Tyler's website, the company had $935 million in annual revenue in 2018 and employs more than 5,000 people. In addition to providing technology and software for courts across the country, it also services the public administration and education sectors, among others. In one year, 4.3 million people use Tyler's systems to submit payments, file court documents and do other e-services. Odyssey File & Serve, the company's e-filing and case management software system, processes 167 million e-filed pages each year.
About Akoloutheo
A PACER searched revealed that Akoloutheo has filed 18 patent infringement lawsuits since 2018 against many tech companies such as Intuit Inc., International Business Machines Corp., Oracle America Inc., Symantec Corp. and more.
Case dockets show the parties settled seven of those cases. In eights cases, Akoloutheo moved to dismiss its claims with prejudice before the defendants had even filed answers. In two case, the defendants filed answers and counterclaims against Akoloutheo, but then both parties moved to dismiss their claims with prejudice.
Frisco solo practitioner Ronald Burns, who represents the plaintiff, noted that in some of the cases that were dismissed with prejudice, there was a settlement, but the defendant requested that Akoloutheo refrain from filing a notice of settlement publicly.
"The company is a nonpracticing entity that is licensing this patent, and it's part of their licensing campaign," explained Burns.
Some people call nonpracticing entities "patent trolls," a term that patent litigator Michael Smith said he never uses because it's derogatory. Some federal judges have even banned the term in court, he noted.
Smith said that 18 patent infringement lawsuits by a nonpracticing entity is not an unusual number. The fact that so many of Akoloutheo's cases settled so early, he added, may indicate the defendants wanted to avoid the nuisance of litigation. When a defendant truly wants to license the plaintiff's technology, it takes more time to flesh out details about the patent.
The cases' dockets can't answer questions about the value of Akoloutheo's patent, he said.
"I can't tell if the patents are any good, and I can't tell if it's a shakedown campaign or not," explained Smith, partner-in-charge of Siebman, Forrest, Burg & Smith's Marshall office. "I can't tell what's happening: if it's based on the merits of the patents, or based on nuisance settlements, to get the cases to go away."
|Read the complaint:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEven With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute read'Courts Do Get It Wrong': Legal Experts Discuss State-Law Certification Pros and Cons
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250