Citi: Texas-Based Firms Managed Expenses, But Collections Slipped
The collections cycle slowed by 5% for the first nine months of 2019 at homegrown Texas firms, according to a new Citi report.
November 13, 2019 at 10:16 AM
3 minute read
Texas law firms kept the lid on expenses during the first nine months of 2019, but demand has declined and collections have slowed, Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group reported Tuesday.
Expenses grew by only 2% at the Texas firms participating in the survey, a substantially better result than the 4.7% increase in expenses industrywide.
But demand at the Texas firms declined by 3.9% in the first three quarters of 2019, compared with the same period in 2018, while demand grew by 0.9% on average across the industry, according to Citi.
And, while Texas firms had been outperforming the industry in collections during the first half of the year, that marker took a turn for the worse by the end of September. For the first nine months of the year, the collections cycle at the Texas firms lengthened by 5%, compared with 1.5% for the industry.
Citi collected information from a sample of 190 law firms, including 10 firms based in Texas, for the report. In a key finding, revenue growth of 5.1% exceeded 4.7% expense growth for the industry, but that was not the case in Texas where revenue grew by 1.3% and expenses grew by 2%.
Gretta Rusanow, head of advisory services for Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group, said the positive takeaway from the report for Texas-based firms is the relatively modest expense growth, with the Texas region posting the lowest growth in expenses for the nine-month period. But the declining demand growth at Texas firms—a contraction in work—is a negative, she said.
While 2019 has not been a particularly strong year for the legal industry as a whole, especially compared to 2018, the survey results indicate the Texas market is contracting, she said.
Revenue growth for the Texas-based firms was 1.3% in the first three quarters, according to Rusanow, compared with a 5.1% revenue growth industry-wide.
Rusanow noted that while revenue growth was "fairly tepid" in Texas, accounts receivable at those 10 firms grew by 4.4% and unbilled time grew by 7.8%. That bodes well for the coming months, she said.
"What's happened during this third quarter is we are actually seeing a build up of inventory. The message is it's here to be collected," she said, noting as year-end nears, firms will typically be putting a push on collections anyway.
Still, according to the firms surveyed, the buildup of accounts receivable is a result of slow-paying clients, Rusanow said, and not laxity in sending out invoices.
Total lawyer head count is down 1% in Texas for the nine-month period, which contrasts with an industry that is adding lawyers. With fewer lawyers, productivity declined by 2.9% at the Texas firms during the period, compared with a 0.7% decline for the industry.
But Rusanow said the Texas decline is likely due to the impact of non-Texas-based firms in the market staffing up with lateral hires from the homegrown Texas firms.
"What we report on here is Texas headquartered firms. It's not a comment on the Texas market," she said.
Read More
As Clients Toughen Payment Terms, Texas Firms Continue to Collect
Citi Survey: Homegrown Texas Firms Outperform Industry in Key Areas
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJCPenney Seeks Return of More Than $1.1M From Jackson Walker For Bankruptcy Work
3 minute readEx-Appellate Court Judges Launch Boutique Focused on Plaintiffs Appeals
2 minute readO'Melveny, White & Case, Skadden Beef Up in Texas With Energy, Real Estate Lateral Partner Hires
5 minute readChamberlain Hrdlicka Taps a New Leader as Firm Follows Succession Planning Path
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250