22 States Have Lawyer Civility Oaths. It's not enough.
A promise to be civil in the new-lawyer oath may be a good starting point, but stakeholders and observers recognize the oath is not enough to stem the ongoing problem of lawyers behaving badly.
November 14, 2019 at 03:00 PM
6 minute read
Recognizing a rise is attorney misbehavior, nearly half the states in America have added a promise to remain civil to the oaths that lawyers take to gain admission to the bar.
It's a good starting point and worthy goal, but stakeholders and observers say the oath is not enough to stem the ongoing problem of lawyers behaving badly.
"You can be more effective by treating your opposing counsel and opposing parties with respect and dignity," said Mike Maguire, national president of the American Board of Trial Advocates, the group that spread the civility oath around the nation. "I think it's had an effect at teaching lawyers, early on, that you can be effective by treating people well. You can be a zealous advocate, without becoming a zealot."
Still, enforcing civility is easier when attorneys know they'll face ethics charges, or a judge's wrath, when they misbehave, Maguire said.
"The key thing is that the profession needs to enforce rules that sanction and prohibit uncivil, unprofessional behavior," he said.
That sentiment is echoed by New York University School of Law Professor Stephen Gillers, who calls for more teeth than one oath can provide to enforce decency among attorneys.
"I admire the impulse; I admire the goal. But I think the impact on actual behavior will be negligible. It's sad to say, but if anything, we've seen increasing levels of incivility over the years, not decreases," Gillers said. "Unless there is a price—unless a lawyer, inclined to behave badly, can anticipate a sanction that will hurt—he or she will do it."
|Civility oath spreads
The push to add a promise to remain civil to the new-lawyer oath was led by the American Board of Trial Advocates, a legal advocacy group with invitation-only membership for highly experienced litigators. Twenty-two states, including California, Texas, Florida, Virginia and Delaware, have adopted lawyer civility oaths. Many other states—like Connecticut, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania—that haven't adopted such oaths still offer attorneys training about civility through their local ABOTA chapters.
David Chamberlain, former president of the Texas Chapters of ABOTA who advocated for the Texas civility oath in 2015, said it's hard to measure the impact of the oath in the four years since it passed the Texas Legislature. That law added a line to the oath to "conduct oneself with integrity and civility in dealing and communicating with the court and all parties."
"I think it's just a part of something that sets the right tone at the very beginning of a lawyer's career," Chamberlain said. "It gives the lawyer something to talk to the client about: 'I can't or shouldn't do certain things. Not only here is the Texas lawyers creed, which guides my conduct, but I also took a civility oath when I got my license, so I am under oath to conduct myself civilly.'"
The oath is not a basis for an attorney disciplinary rules violation, nor can clients sue their attorneys for legal malpractice based on alleged violations of the oath, he noted. Stakeholders of plaintiffs and defense attorney associations, and lawmakers who champion tort reform efforts, needed those promises before they supported the bill in the legislature, explained Chamberlain.
"As far as anything else we could do in the legislature, I don't see that on the immediate horizon. I see it at this point more in terms of education, socialization and mentorship," he said.
ABOTA has also led an effort to train attorneys about civility. Its civility matters program elevates standards of integrity, honor and courtesy among lawyers, ABOTA spokeswoman Tara Nunley explained in an email.
"Our local chapters host programs around the country to teach and educate attorneys on civility in the courtroom," Nunley said about the program.
At the urging of the California Chapters of ABOTA and the State Bar of California, the California Supreme Court in 2014 adopted a change to the lawyer oath for attorneys to swear, "as an officer of the court, I will strive to conduct myself at all times with dignity, courtesy and integrity." Just like in Texas, the oath can't form a basis for grievances or professional negligence lawsuits.
Beyond the oath, California has launched voluntary civility and professionalism guidelines to provide a model for what attorneys, voluntary bar associations and courts should expect from lawyers' behavior. Those guidelines have been adopted by 17 local bar associations and courts, including bars in Los Angeles, San Diego and Sacramento, and U.S. District Courts in the Central, Northern and Southern Districts of California.
|Adding teeth
Florida has had its civility oath even longer—since 2011, when the Florida Chapters of ABOTA supported the change. Unlike in other states, Florida's oath is enforceable within the state's attorney discipline rules.
South Carolina, which has had a civility oath since 2003, also allows attorneys to face discipline for violating the oath.
That type of bite is what's really needed to change the profession, not only from the bar's disciplinary arm, but from judges too, said Gillers, the law professor from New York.
"If judges were more aggressive in their insistence on decency—I don't say politeness; I just say decency—in the ways lawyers treat others, I think we'd see a sharp decline in incivility," Gillers said. "Anything that increases the chances of a judicial sanction will work toward reducing incivility. When I say sanction, I don't mean a fine, or other effect on your license to practice. I mean simply an opinion in which you are called out."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAdvising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
4 minute readHomegrown Texas Law Firms Expanded Outside the Lone Star State in 2024 As Out-of-State Firms Moved In
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
6 minute read'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250