GM, Fiat, Maserati Among Automakers Sued for Alleged Patent Infringement
Blitzsafe Texas, based in Marshall, has filed 15 lawsuits in four years against the world's largest automakers for allegedly infringing its two patents for a device that integrates a mobile device with a car's stereo system. The company sued General Motors Co., Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and Maserati North America.
November 18, 2019 at 04:18 PM
3 minute read
General Motors Co., Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and Maserati North America have joined a long list of auto manufacturers that have been sued by a Texas company that makes and sells integration devices that connect mobile devices to car stereo systems.
Blitzsafe Texas, based in Marshall, has owned two patents since 2009 and 2012 for its device that allows people to link their smartphones and car audio systems, enabling them to take hands-free phone calls and play music. One patent covers a wired integration device, and the other covers a Bluetooth device.
The company filed two complaints—one against GM, the other against Fiat Chrysler and Maserati—that allege the vehicles they manufacture have components that are infringing Blitzsafe's patents. The lawsuits are very similar.
Since 2013, GM has placed infringing "Infotainment Systems" in its Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet and GMC branded vehicles, and they're being sold at auto dealerships across Texas, the GM complaint said.
The lawsuit against Fiat Crysler and Maserati alleged that the companies since 2013 have been infringing Blitzsafe's patents in vehicles branded as Chrysler, Fiat, Dodge, Jeep, Ram, Alfa Romeo and Maserati.
Blitzsafe, which brings claims for two counts of patent infringement in each lawsuit, alleged that the defendants knew about its patents because of past litigation involving the defendants' Infotainment System suppliers. Yet they have kept infringing on the patents, which Blitzsafe claims makes it entitled to a treble damages award and attorney fees.
Fiat Chrysler spokesman Michael Palese wrote in an email that the company hasn't been served with the lawsuit, and would not comment on the allegations.
General Motors spokesman James Cain also declined to comment.
A search of PACER showed that Blitzsafe has filed 15 patent infringement lawsuits in the past four years against the world's largest automakers, including Mitsubishi, Subaru, Toyota, Mazda, Honda, Volkswagen and more. For example, in 2015 it filed five patent infringement cases that named six automakers as defendants.
So far, the company has resolved its previous lawsuits against automakers, said Fred Fabricant, a partner in Brown Rudnick in New York, who represents Blitzsafe.
"All of them are permitted now to sell [the] product," Fabricant said. "We believe it was a very successful overall campaign against a large number of companies, and it continues to move forward."
Fabricant added that aside from the two new filings on Friday, the only other Blitzsafe lawsuit that's still pending is against Robert Bosch GmbH, a German company that manufactures and sells audio equipment. Bosch allegedly manufactures infringing products and sells them to General Motors, according to an amended complaint. A trial in that case is set for May 4, 2020.
A representative for Maserati didn't immediately answer an email seeking comment.
Related stories:
Read the GM petition:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKelly Hart Secures $27M Trade Secrets Misappropriation Final Judgment in Fort Worth Trial
3 minute readFilm Company Alleges Elon Musk, Tesla Used AI to Mimic 'Blade Runner' Scene
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250