'You Better Call Me': Disbarred Texas Lawyer Arrested for Allegedly Threatening Judge
Hidalgo County Jail records show the Texas Department of Public Safety on Nov. 15 arrested Mark Cantu on charges of coercion of a public servant, and improper influence.
November 19, 2019 at 05:06 PM
4 minute read
Legal troubles are mounting for a lawyer who lost his law license.
Just three weeks after the Texas Supreme Court upheld the disbarment of Mark Cantu, the ex-lawyer was arrested for allegedly threatening a district judge in a voicemail.
Cantu denies the allegations.
"We will fight these allegations the judge filed against me," he said. "I think they are frivolous."
Hidalgo County Jail records show the Texas Department of Public Safety on Nov. 15 arrested Cantu on charges of coercion of a public servant, and improper influence. Both charges are Class A misdemeanors. On the same day as his arrest, Cantu was released on a $1,000 surety bond for each charge, according to jail records.
The probable cause affidavit in the case said that on Oct. 8, Cantu left a voicemail about a case for Hidalgo County 332nd District Judge Mario Ramirez.
"I'm going to call the FBI and tell the FBI what the hell you are doing as the presiding judge of the 332nd getting involved with helping your friend Carlos Guerra and Michael Moore," Cantu said in the voicemail, according to the affidavit. "You better call me and you better straighten it out, and if I were you I would not sign any orders and if you signed some orders, I would rescind them immediately."
The affidavit said that Ramirez told the Texas Ranger that Cantu had filed similar lawsuits against Hidalgo County District Attorney Ricardo Rodriguez in multiple district courts, but then nonsuited the matters and refiled new lawsuits in different courts. Ramirez said Cantu was forum shopping, according to the affidavit.
Ramirez, the local presiding judge, was tasked with enforcing local rules, including a rule saying when a litigant was forum shopping, the case would be sent back to the very first court where it was filed. Ramirez therefore had to determine whether or not Cantu was forum shopping, and if so, decide whether to send it back to the original court.
But because of Cantu's voicemail, Ramirez recused himself.
"After receiving the phone call, Judge Ramirez explained that he felt he could no longer be fair to Cantu in deciding on this case," the affidavit said. "He believed he was now a complainant in a criminal matter against Cantu and it would not be appropriate for him to continue as the judge over this case."
Ramirez declined to comment.
Read the probable cause affidavit:
||
Previous Litigation
In the voicemail, Cantu allegedly said Ramirez was helping "his friends" Carlos Guerra and Michael Moore.
For more than a decade, Cantu, Guerra and Moore have been embroiled in litigation over an attorney fee award in a 2005 wrongful death lawsuit, Texas Lawyer reported. Guerra and Moore's law firm first represented the clients, but after a month, Cantu's law firm took over. Later, three associates at Cantu's firm left to start their own practice, and took the clients along, according to appellate records. Eventually the case settled for $4 million.
In later attorney-fee litigation, Guerra & Moore alleged that Cantu stole the clients, but Cantu countered that the firm was conspiring to deprive him of his attorney fee. The three former Cantu associates settled before trial, at which Guerra & Moore won a $1.6 million judgment against Cantu.
An appellate court affirmed the verdict in 2009. But Cantu, in later litigation, alleged that Guerra, Moore and other attorneys conspired with the clients by getting one client to perjure himself regarding the attorney fee claims.
In an interview, Cantu said he thinks his arrest was another attempt by Guerra and Moore to delay and confuse the facts.
"The facts are they conspired," he said. "They conspired to defraud me and take my license."
Guerra didn't immediately return calls seeking comment before deadline.
Moore, who's now the owner and principal attorney of Moore Law Firm in McAllen and Houston, said that claim is outrageous. It was the State Bar of Texas that disbarred Cantu, and the Texas Rangers that arrested him based on a threat he made to the judge.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAdvising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
4 minute readHomegrown Texas Law Firms Expanded Outside the Lone Star State in 2024 As Out-of-State Firms Moved In
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
6 minute read'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Top Five Florida Verdicts of 2024
- 2The Evolution of a Virtual Court System
- 3New Acquitted Conduct Guideline: An Analysis
- 4Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 52024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250