1 Step From Partner? Austin Lawyer Claims Firm Fired Him to Prevent Advancement
Austin lawyer Raul Sandoval alleges that national family law firm Cordell & Cordell, a "father's rights" firm that represents men in divorce and child custody matters, fired him before he could make partner because the firm didn't want to allow a Latino attorney to break into the ranks of the all-white partnership there. Cordell & Cordell denies the allegations.
December 03, 2019 at 05:28 PM
4 minute read
A Latino attorney from Austin alleged that a nationwide family law firm fired him before he made partner to ensure its partnership ranks remained all white. The firm denies the allegations.
"There is not a single minority, non-white, partner," alleged plaintiff Raul Sandoval's petition. "Plaintiff would have changed that make-up of the leadership of the firm, so defendant prevented that from happening by concocting a reason to terminate him."
Cordell & Cordell markets itself as a "fathers' rights" firm representing men in divorces and child custody cases, according to its website. The site lists 37 offices, including five Texas offices and locations in California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania and other states. The firm employs at least 275 lawyers, according to the original petition in Sandoval v. Cordell & Cordell, which the law firm removed on Monday to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas in Austin.
Sandoval's attorney, James Tawney, said his client hopes the lawsuit will prevent other associates from facing injustice at Cordell & Cordell.
"Our client was a high-producing and loyal attorney of several years for Cordell & Cordell, one of the largest family law firms in the nation. As a reward for his dedication and service to their firm, Cordell & Cordell created baseless allegations to terminate him rather than offering him advancement," said Tawney, a partner in Flores, Tawney & Acosta in El Paso. "We believe the evidence will show that Cordell & Cordell made this decision based on unlawful discrimination."
Cordell & Cordell said that Sandoval's claims are without merit, according to an email by the firm's attorney, Julie Tower, an associate with Jackson Lewis in Austin.
"Cordell & Cordell P.C. is an equal opportunity employer that prohibits any and all forms of discrimination in its workplace. We firmly deny Mr. Sandoval's allegations," said the firm's statement.
Originally filed in Travis County District Court, Sandoval alleged in his Aug. 22 petition that Cordell & Cordell hired him in 2012 as an associate. When he was fired six years later, he was a senior lead litigator, just one step away from partnership. He was expecting to make it because he had earned high accolades, including recognition as a top attorney, top regional performer, and top biller at the firm.
Despite his awards, he claimed that white attorneys earned promotions faster than him.
Sandoval alleged that in June 2018, two executive managing partners called him into a meeting to discuss supposed client issues. They said someone who was not a client submitted client surveys to the law firm's client care department regarding clients that Sandoval represented. They gave Sandoval scarce details about the surveys or names of clients. The firm didn't include him in the investigation into the matter.
Sandoval, who is now a family law solo practitioner in Austin, alleged it was a pretext for a baseless termination meant to bar his partnership within the next couple of years.
According to the petition, Sandoval's punishment was more severe than those of other attorneys in the past. One white female partner was caught urinating in trash cans and she only received a demotion. A white male partner faced several sexual harassment allegations, but remained in his position. Firm leaders have made discriminatory comments about other nonwhite employees, Sandoval claimed.
In a Nov. 23 answer, Cordell & Cordell denied all of Sandoval's allegations. The firm also alleged that Sandoval didn't take reasonable steps to mitigate his damages. Cordell & Cordell took prompt, effective remedial action to end objectionable conduct once it knew about the conduct, although the firm also denied that conduct, the answer said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJCPenney Seeks Return of More Than $1.1M From Jackson Walker For Bankruptcy Work
3 minute readEx-Appellate Court Judges Launch Boutique Focused on Plaintiffs Appeals
2 minute readO'Melveny, White & Case, Skadden Beef Up in Texas With Energy, Real Estate Lateral Partner Hires
5 minute readChamberlain Hrdlicka Taps a New Leader as Firm Follows Succession Planning Path
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250