Houston Ex-Judge in Hot Water for Saying Black Defendants Disrespect Laws, Police
Former District Judge Michael McSpadden told a newspaper reporter that black defendants got bad advice from their parents and Black Lives Matter to resist law enforcement and disrespect the rule of law. Now the ex-judge was sanctioned for the comments.
December 03, 2019 at 01:49 PM
5 minute read
Comments about black men in the criminal justice system brought a public warning for former District Judge Michael McSpadden of Houston.
While McSpadden was judge of Harris County's 209th District Court, he was quoted in a February 2018 newspaper article saying he feared defendants released on bond would commit new offenses. He stated that young black men charged with felonies weren't getting good advice from their parents and "rag-tag" organizations like Black Lives Matter. That advice told them to resist police, and have contempt for police and the justice system, the judge is quoted as saying in the Houston Chronicle.
"The incendiary advice I see from Black Lives Matter can be counterproductive to some of the young men who find themselves dealing with the criminal justice system," he said in the newspaper article, according to the public warning.
A public warning is more severe than any of the private sanctions that the judicial conduct commission can issue. When it comes to public sanctions, a warning is the middle level of severity. The judicial conduct commission released the public warning Monday, although it issued the sanction Nov. 12.
The ACLU of Texas filed the complaint against McSpadden, according to a press release. The group also protested the judge's comments on Twitter.
We are calling for Harris County Judge Michael McSpadden to step aside following his discriminatory remarks last Friday.
"Black men have always been disproportionately targeted for punishment by the courts for no reason other than the color of our skin." @AnthonyCGraves pic.twitter.com/6itvJDfcNV
— ACLU of Texas (@ACLUTx) February 27, 2018
The judge's comments did not end with the article quotation.
McSpadden later wrote an editorial published in the same newspaper that repeated the sentiments. He wrote in the editorial that during his 36 years on the bench, defendants of all races had changed their attitudes, and no longer respect the rule of law.
"In the case of young black defendants who are disproportionately represented in our system, they are not receiving good advice from their parents as did my generation, to cooperate with law enforcement at all times, and respect the laws," he wrote in the editorial, according to the public warning.
When McSpadden responded to the judicial conduct commission regarding a complaint about his statements, he wrote that racial disparity in the criminal justice system is a serious issue and that people should be able to talk about the problem to help find a solution. Calling someone a racist wouldn't solve the problem of too many black men in the system, he wrote in his response.
In the warning, the commission found that McSpadden's conduct violated a rule in the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct that requires a judge to conduct his extra-judicial activities in a way that does not cast reasonable doubt on the judge's ability to act impartially. McSpadden also violated a part of the Texas Constitution that allows a judge to face discipline for willful, persistent conduct that's inconsistent with his duties and casts public discredit on the judiciary or administration of justice.
In May 2018, a visiting judge removed McSpadden from a criminal case when that defendant's attorneys argued that McSpadden's racial comments raised the appearance of bias, the Houston Chronicle reported. Prosecutors didn't oppose McSpadden's recusal, saying they disagreed with the judge's comments and would not defend him.
This August, McSpadden was one of 11 current and former district judges who received public admonitions for using bail bond practices that violated Texas law and cast public discredit upon the judiciary. His attorney, Nicole DeBorde, denied that the group of judges violated the law and said the judicial conduct commission overstepped its authority by purporting to be a court that's able to answer questions of law. She said shortly after the admonitions came out, the commission withdrew them. They've all been deleted from the commission's website.
No one answered multiple calls at the phone number that McSpadden has listed on his State Bar of Texas profile. DeBorde, partner in Hochglaube & DeBorde in Houston, didn't immediately return a call seeking comment.
Read the public warning:
Related story:
11 Houston Judges Were Sanctioned. What Happened Next is a Mystery
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250