Suit Alleges County Attorney Misused Funds, Had Intimate Relationship With Staffer
A former narcotics task force commander alleged he was fired for speaking out about a county attorney's alleged misuse of the funds and property his task force seized from suspected drug traffickers and other alleged criminals. He alleges the county attorney used the funds to grant donations to community entities, hoping they'd turn into her own political supporters.
December 04, 2019 at 03:48 PM
5 minute read
A South Texas narcotics task force commander alleged he was fired to silence his complaints that Kleberg County Attorney Kira Talip was misusing public funds and having an alleged sexual relationship with another employee.
Thomas Roddy, the former commander of the South Texas Specialized Crimes and Narcotics Task Force, has sued Talip in federal court, alleging that he spoke out repeatedly about her alleged misuse of his task force's property seizure fund. Talip was granting donation requests, typically between $500 to $5,000, to various Kingsville entities that were not eligible to receive public funds and had not submitted applications or explanations of how they would use the money, Roddy claimed.
Roddy's attorney, Corpus Christi solo practitioner Jon Brooks, said the task force's property seizure fund is robust, but he's unsure at this point in his investigation how much money Talip allegedly misused.
"A lot of drugs move along Highway 77," Brooks said about a highway that connects Kleberg County's county seat, Kingsville, to a smaller town, Riviera. "You'd find there's a lot of traffic stops that result in seizures of cash, significant amounts of cash, and that's where the money comes from."
The task force posted photos of a recent bust:
Talip didn't return a call or email seeking comment before deadline. But her attorney, Brian Miller, partner in Royston Rayzor in Corpus Christi, wrote in an email that Roddy's allegations are not true and the suit lacks merit. Miller said he believes the suit lacks sufficient evidence, and he planned to move for dismissal.
Located along the Texas Gulf Coast south of Corpus Christi, Kleberg County had an estimated population of 31,100 in 2018, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Roddy especially objected to a $16,000 donation that Talip granted to King Ranch Security so it could purchase police radios for its security units, according to the Dec. 3 original complaint in Roddy v. Kleberg County Attorney Kira Talip, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas in Corpus Christi. Roddy told Talip that it appeared she granted those funds as a political favor, which was an illegal use of property seizure funds.
"Talip later admitted to the plaintiff that she wanted to give the donation because the King Ranch was a powerful, political ally for her to have in Kingsville," alleged the complaint.
According to the Handbook of Texas Online, King Ranch formed in the 1850s with a stock of Texas Longhorn cattle. By the 1950s, there were 650 producing oil and gas wells there. Today, the ranch spans a massive 1,300 square miles—that's larger than Rhode Island—across six Texas counties, including Kleberg County. It's grown into one of the largest privately held corporations in the United States, said the Handbook of Texas.
Roddy's lawsuit alleged that he talked to Talip about his concern that a lack of documentation of the donation requests would make it impossible for the public to scrutinize the use of public funds. After his complaints, Talip started hiding information from him about the donations. But another task force employee complained to him that she was "giving money away at an alarming rate."
|Sexual relationships
Meanwhile, Roddy had launched an investigation about alleged improper sexual relationships in the workforce. The wife of a task force agent told Roddy that her husband was having an improper relationship with a female task force employee. She wanted that woman fired. Otherwise, she said she would make public allegations that Talip herself was in an improper relationship with a senior special agent. The wife demanded that the senior special agent face discipline or discharge, too.
According to the complaint, Roddy opposed how much time Talip spent with that senior special agent, believing it was sexually oriented. They had "inappropriate sexual-in-nature conversations" in front of other staff, said the complaint.
During his investigation, Roddy informed Talip of the wife's threat to make the public allegation about her relationship with the senior special agent. Talip then discharged the female task force employee whom the wife had alleged was in a relationship with her husband. But the senior special agent faced no disciplinary action, the complaint said.
"The plaintiff was later discharged by the defendants, at least in part, to silence and quash further investigation by the plaintiff of sexual harassment allegations or hostile work environment allegations based on improper sexual relationships in the workplace," alleged the complaint.
But Miller, Talip's attorney, said that in a resignation letter, Roddy didn't mention misuse of forfeiture funds or any allegedly improper relationship involving Talip.
"The Commissioner's Court unanimously and lawfully approved the purchase of radios for the commissioned officers working at the King Ranch so that those officers could communicate effectively with other law-enforcement officers in the county," he said. "No improper relationship occurred, and Roddy's resignation letter distanced himself from the investigation of an administrative assistant's conduct that allegedly yielded the accusation."
|Read the complaint:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEven With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute read'Courts Do Get It Wrong': Legal Experts Discuss State-Law Certification Pros and Cons
9 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250