Companies Expect More Litigation In The New Year. What Does This Mean For Litigators?
Norton Rose Fulbright's annual litigation trends survey shows that more corporate counsel expect to see more litigation in the New Year. Texas Lawyer chatted with partner Saul Perloff of San Antonio to learn what this means for litigators and law firms.
December 11, 2019 at 03:15 PM
4 minute read
Ask corporate counsel if they expect more, less or the same level of litigation in the New Year, and there's always a pessimistic group that expects more.
Typically, about 25% of inhouse lawyers say so, yet that rate rose to 35% in a survey released Wednesday by Norton Rose Fulbright, which surveyed nearly 300 corporate counsel about 2019 litigation trends. The increase is significant to partner Saul Perloff of San Antonio: He hasn't seen such a big spike in a while, he said, noting he's been involved with the survey for 14 of the 15 years his firm has released it.
"I sit up and take note of that," Perloff said. "That's telling me there is a concern out there about the future."
Texas Lawyer chatted with Perloff about the survey findings and asked how litigators and law firms can use the information to serve their clients. Here are his answers, edited for brevity and clarity.
What is the most valuable thing that lawyers and law firms can do with the information in the 2019 Litigation Trends Annual Survey?
It helps us as outside counsel to understand what our clients perceive as their biggest challenges. That helps us better serve their needs. For example, if our inside counsel is expressing a concern about cybersecurity, we had better be ready to address that.
If you are in-house counsel, and you read the survey, it helps to perhaps confirm what you've been worried about, or perhaps to get you to begin thinking about risks that maybe you haven't yet thought about.
The survey notes that fears the economy may soon decline may cause increases in the amount of litigation. If this did happen, can you tell me what litigators and firms can do to prepare?
A downturn in the economy can often lead to increased litigation. I think our job is to be aware of it and be ready. Law firms, particularly firms like ours, we're not going to double our size overnight. There's a limited pool of people who are qualified to do it. What we can do is begin to reach out to our clients. When we get a survey like this, and see, 'Yes, our clients have the same concerns that we do about the economy and a potential increase,' we begin to reach out to them now and say, 'What is it we can do for you to help you understand and manage the risk?'
Among the corporate counsel who responded to your survey, 44% expected to see cybersecurity and data privacy suits and 52% said they feel exposed to cyber risk. How do you feel that cybersecurity attorneys should respond to this news?
I think in-house counsel are beginning to recognize this and identify this as a risk. Before, companies may have viewed it as a risk facing tech companies. As more and more companies maintain and use data—and data becomes more and more of an important asset—any companies can be exposed. I think the fact that in-house counsel are recognizing it helps because we can work with them to implement programs so they can understand it and manage it.
Read the survey:
Related story:
Daily Dicta: Why 2020 Looks Good for Litigators (But No One Else)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSheppard Mullin Expands in Dallas With 6-Lawyer White Collar Team From Bradley
3 minute readOnce the LA Fires Are Extinguished, Expect the Litigation to Unfold for Years
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250