These Texas Lawyers Are Giving Away Millions of Dollars
Pro bono lawyers and firms already donate their time to their clients, but some take gifting to the next level by winning attorney fee awards and donating the fees to charity. For example, in Texas, two firms plan to gift $6 million in attorney fees to launch programs for foster children.
December 23, 2019 at 11:38 AM
5 minute read
It's the season of giving.
Rather than wrapping a new pair of slippers for the Christmas tree, there's a $6 million donation planned by two Texas law firms whose pro bono case declared the Texas foster care system unconstitutional.
Houston-based litigation boutique Yetter Coleman and Big Law firm Haynes and Boone want to gift their fees—$4.68 million and $1.53 million, respectively—to launch new programs for Texas foster care children.
"This case, for us, for my firm, has been a labor of love from the beginning," said Yetter Coleman managing partner Paul Yetter. "We are just on the cusp of major reform, and this has always been about the children. We thought the best use of the fee for our work would be for these children."
The donation plan is part of a total $20.81 million attorney fee award sought by a class of foster kids, who won rulings that said the Texas foster care system is unconstitutional and laid out recommendations to improve the system. The state is opposing the fees as exorbitant, and the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas in Corpus Christi is expected to decide the dispute in the new year.
Although this is the first time that Yetter's law firm has won attorney fees in a pro bono case and chosen to donate the fees to charity, the practice is somewhat common in the nonprofit law firm world. Fee donations can go a long way to meet nonprofit firms' missions.
Jim Harrington, former director of the Texas Civil Rights Project, said that the nonprofit firm's pro bono counsel almost always donated their attorney fees to the group. The donated fees could range from $5,000 to tens of thousands of dollars. Those donations made up 10% of the nonprofit's general operating budget, he said.
"It was very important for us," Harrington said. "What it did was actually allow us to expand our services and provide more services around the state."
In June, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw and Pittman donated about $1.5 million in attorney fees to the nonprofit firm Disability Rights Legal Center, said firm spokesman Erik Cummins in an email. Pillsbury retired partner Christine Scheuneman of Los Angeles, who didn't return a call or email seeking comment, was the lead pro bono lawyer for the center in a case by disabled students who were physically injured at school. Staff physically restrained them or pushed and slapped them. In a 2018 settlement, the Pomona Unified School District in Los Angeles agreed to implement extensive remedial actions.
Pillsbury's fee donation was a huge deal for Disability Rights Legal Center, said Elizabeth Eubanks, the center's formal regional director.
"The real effect of this lawsuit is going to be felt over a lifetime of students," she said. "Not only did they make this commitment by assigning staff to the case. Not only did they make the commitment to providing funding for the costs, up front. But donating the fees back is particularly exceptional."
In the Texas case, Yetter Coleman and Haynes and Boone worked with New York-based nonprofits Children's Rights and A Better Childhood, which work around the nation to better the lives of foster children. Children's Rights has won social impact litigation for foster children in Connecticut, Georgia, New Jersey, Washington, D.C. and other states.
Rather than donating the $6 million fee to those New York nonprofits, though, Yetter said he wanted the fees to focus on Texas foster children.
"We thought it could make a big difference in the lives of these children," he explained.
Haynes and Boone senior counsel Barry McNeil said major law firms have a responsibility to represent the disadvantaged.
"From the very outset my firm never thought that we would be undertaking this for any financial benefit," said McNeil. "We never thought that we would accept any attorney fees if we were so lucky to win."
Yetter noted that the two court-appointed monitors in the case are child welfare experts, and he looks forward to their recommendations and guidance on how to spend the $6 million donation. He expects to be able to fund more than one program, he said.
"One example is a program for older foster children who are about to age out of the system, and help them transition into a world that, at the moment, they are ill-prepared to go into," Yetter said.
Related story:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAdvising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
4 minute readHomegrown Texas Law Firms Expanded Outside the Lone Star State in 2024 As Out-of-State Firms Moved In
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
6 minute read'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250