The Stemme S10 is a self-launching sailplane produced by Stemme AG in Strausberg, Germany since the 1980s. The engine is mounted amidships and it features an unusual folding propeller which is stowed inside the aircraft's nose-cone when the engine is not in use. Photo: WikipediaTexas Lawyer Hits Glider Aircraft Company With $600,000 Fee Dispute
East Texas lawyer Joseph Blanks alleged that Stemme AG, a German company that manufactures glider aircraft, owes him nearly $538,500 in attorney fees, plus $72,600 in expenses.
December 31, 2019 at 11:29 AM
3 minute read
An east Texas attorney has sued a German glider aircraft manufacturer for over $600,000 in a fee dispute filed in federal court on Monday.
Joseph C. Blanks P.C. alleged in the lawsuit that Stemme AG breached its contract with the firm when new leadership took over the company and quit paying his legal bills. Solo practitioner Joseph Blanks of Doucette, Texas, works at the firm, according to State Bar of Texas records.
The Dec. 30 original complaint in Joseph C. Blanks v. Stemme AG said in 1999 or 2000, Blanks purchased a glider aircraft from Stemme in Texas. Blanks started doing legal work for the airplane manufacturer in 2003. The CEO at the time entered an attorney-client relationship with Blanks. In 2004, he started marketing Stemme aircraft in Texas and performing other occasional assignments for legal work as late as 2012, when he helped the company handle disputes with maintenance and service colleagues operating in Texas.
A new CEO took over Stemme in 2013 and he extended the attorney-client relationship with Blanks, including entering a new engagement letter regarding the ongoing terms of the relationship and laying out a billing rate of 600 euros per hour, which converts to about $673. That CEO also agreed to reimburse cash advances Blanks made on behalf of the company and to compensate a consulting expert Blanks brought on board.
Stemme honored its contract with Blanks for many years and paid his legal invoices and reimbursed his cash advances, said the complaint.
That cooperation stopped this year.
"Defendant's new managers decline to pay the plaintiff," said the complaint.
The company currently owes Blanks 479,900 euros in attorney fees—that's nearly $538,500—and $58,100 in cash advance reimbursements and $14,500 to compensate the expert consultant.
Blanks' breach-of-contract lawsuit seeks those funds as damages, and also seeks to recover costs and attorney fees.
Blanks didn't immediately return a call or email seeking comment. No one from Stemme AG immediately returned an email seeking comment.
Read the complaint:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Class Action Claims American Airlines Implemented 'Unsustainable' Sales Plan Causing Stock to Tank
4 minute read
737 Max Crash Victims' Families Blast Proposed Boeing Punishment as 'Sweetheart Deal'
5 minute read
Court Stymies Judge Who Ordered Southwest Attorneys Into 'Religious Liberty' Training
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
