Houston Lawyer Alleges Kasowitz Fired Him Amid Compensation Dispute
Former Kasowitz Benson & Torres bankruptcy partner Kyung S. Lee alleges that the firm fired him after he complained about unpaid compensation, after agreeing to pay him $550,000 a year.
January 08, 2020 at 03:18 PM
4 minute read
Houston lawyer Kyung S. Lee has sued his former firm, Kasowitz Benson Torres, alleging it failed to pay him all of the $550,000 it promised after he joined as a partner in Houston in 2018 and then fired him after he complained.
Lee, a bankruptcy lawyer who moved to Kasowitz Benson in September 2018, alleged in a suit filed Tuesday that the firm owes him at least $185,000 in unpaid compensation for his first year there, and also has failed to return his capital account to him.
Now practicing as a solo in Houston, Lee alleged in his petition, filed in State District Court in Harris County, that he was wrongfully excluded from the partnership.
The petition alleges that Kasowitz Benson solicited Lee in 2017 as a potential lateral hire while he was "happily and gainfully" working at midsize firm Diamond McCarthy in Houston. At the firm's request, Lee provided information that he had "forward-looking portable business" for the next 12 months worth at least $750,000, but optimistically as much as $2.5 million.
In June 2018, Kasowitz Benson made Lee an offer calling for annualized base compensation of $550,000 for the balance of 2018. He accepted the offer in August and started at the firm in September, the petition alleged.
However, in early 2019 Lee raised issues about his compensation, and as a result the firm modified the employment agreement to provide for $550,000 in compensation over the first 365 days of his employment, the petition alleged.
"Despite this agreement, defendant paid Lee only $20,000 per month, or $240,000, during the first 365 days of his employment. As of September 5, 2019, defendant still owed Lee the sum of $310,000," the petition alleged.
After Lee repeatedly made requests about the unpaid balance, the firm's executive director Alan Capilupi notified him that he had consulted with partner Marc Kasowitz and the firm would pay him $125,000. Lee alleged that Capilupi offered no explanation for the shortfall, except that the firm took an offset of $51,000 for an auto allowance, LTD insurance and a profit-sharing contribution.
Lee again emailed Capilupi and Kasowitz, expressing his "deep frustration" with the situation, noting that without the full payment he would not be able to pay taxes for 2018 and 2019. Kasowitz responded, the petition alleged, by making "false allegations" about Lee.
Lee's attorney, Andrew Golub of Dow Golub Remels & Gilbreath in Houston, declined to characterize those allegations in an interview Wednesday.
On Oct. 16, 2019, Lee discovered that the firm had not paid his draw for October, and when he questioned Capilupi, the executive director responded that it was done at Kasowitz's instruction, the petition said.
Lee complained again via email, and on Oct. 18, Capilupi notified Lee that he was fired immediately.
Kasowitz did not immediately return a call seeking comment Wednesday. In response to an emailed request for comment, a spokesperson for the firm wrote: "Kyung Lee's allegations are false, and his claims are unfounded."
Lee's suit alleges breach of contract and seeks an accounting of his partnership interest. He alleged he made a $50,000 capital contribution in early 2019 and was assigned a 0.0895118% interest in the firm's profits and a 0.0006157% interest in the firm's capital.
Additionally, Lee alleged that the firm's executive committee did not properly vote to involuntarily remove him from the partnership.
The story has been updated to include a comment from Kasowitz Benson.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAkin, Baker Botts, Vinson & Elkins Are First Texas Big Law Firms to Match Milbank Bonuses
4 minute readAnticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readRevenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
3 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250