Appellate Court Sides With Incumbent Judge in Primary Ballot Fight
The Harris County Democratic Party must place Houston Judge George Powell's name on the ballot for its primary election. Natalia Cornelio is challenging Powell for the 351st District Court in Harris County.
January 16, 2020 at 01:29 PM
3 minute read
Houston Judge George Powell is now assured he'll appear on the Democratic Primary ballot after his opponent lost an appeal in an election dispute stemming from a shortfall in Powell's application filing fee.
Natalia Cornelio, who's challenging Powell for the 351st District Court in Harris County, sought a writ of mandamus to overturn a trial court decision that ordered the Harris County Democratic Party to certify Powell as a candidate, and put his name on the primary ballot.
But the Fourteenth Court of Appeal on Thursday ruled that Cornelio didn't qualify for mandamus relief.
The per curiam opinion explained that a writ of mandamus is only appropriate if a trial court clearly abused its discretion, and the relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy. Yet Cornelio never filed a notice of appeal or attempted to secure an accelerated process, the opinion said. Also, she had already attempted to get an emergency motion for a stay of the trial court's order, but the Texas Supreme Court denied her request, the opinion said.
"I was disappointed that they chose to seek mandamus, but … I was very happy that the court saw this for what it was, and swiftly ruled for Judge Powell," said Powell's attorney, Kent Schaffer, partner in Schaffer Carter & Associates in Houston. "Now I'm hoping they let it go and let the voters decide who ought to be the next judge."
Cornelio said she would not appeal the Fourteenth Court's ruling and instead would focus on her campaign for the primary.
"My opponent and I have both been impacted by the uncertainty of this legal situation for over a month, and now it is finally resolved. However, the problems in our criminal justice system will continue until we elect judges prepared to do something about them," she said. "I am running for judge to ensure that our courts serve the community, have better bail practices and guarantee equal justice under the law."
Powell didn't immediately return a call or email seeking comment about the ruling.
The judge applied for a place on the ballot Dec. 9, which was the deadline for candidates to file to run. A staff member of the Harris County Democratic Party inadvertently told him his filing fee was $1,500, and a manager accepted Powell's application without noting the filing fee error. Powell was supposed to have paid $2,500.
But just after this, Powell assisted another candidate by writing a $2,500 check for her filing fee and allowing her to reimburse him later, since she only had a debit card, which the party wouldn't accept. That candidate was eventually rejected for other reasons, and Powell argued that the party should have applied that $2,500 to his own filing fee, rather than rejecting him as a candidate for failing to pay the right amount.
A trial judge sided with his arguments and ordered the party to accept his application, certify him as a candidate and place his name on the primary ballot.
Because the Fourteenth Court rejected Cornelio's attempt to overturn that order, it means that the local Democratic party must place Powell's name on the ballot.
Those ballots must meet a Jan. 18 deadline to go to the printer.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Million-Dollar Verdict: Broward Jury Sides With Small Business
- 2'Reluctant to Trust'?: NY Courts Continue to Grapple With Complexities of Jury Diversity
- 3'Careless Execution' of Presidential Pardons Freed Convicted Sex Trafficker, US Judge Laments
- 4Newsmakers: Littler Elevates Dallas Attorney to Shareholder
- 5South Florida Real Estate Lawyers See More Deals Flow, But Concerns Linger
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250