This aerial photo taken from video provided by KTRK-TV shows damage to buildings after an explosion in Houston on Friday, Jan. 24, 2020. A large explosion left rubble scattered in the area, damaged nearby homes and was felt for miles away. A fire continues to burn and people have been told to avoid the area. (KTRK-TV via AP)That Was Fast! Lawsuit Already Filed Over Friday's Explosion in Houston
The explosion happened just after 4 a.m., and Houston resident Sophia S. Navarro filed her lawsuit about 12:15 p.m. against Watson Grinding & Manufacturing Co.
January 24, 2020 at 03:24 PM
3 minute read
That was fast.
Just eight hours after an industrial explosion rocked a Houston neighborhood on Friday, a resident has filed a million-dollar lawsuit against the manufacturing plant that caused the blast.
The explosion happened just after 4 a.m., and Sophia S. Navarro filed her lawsuit about 12:15 p.m. against Watson Grinding & Manufacturing Co.
"Defendants went beyond failing to heed the warnings, they intentionally refused to take action to prevent damage to their facility and the surrounding area," alleged the petition.
The purpose of filing the lawsuit so quickly was to get a court order requiring Watson to preserve evidence, explained plaintiffs attorney Eric Dick of The Dick Law Firm in Houston. He secured a temporary restraining order on Friday that sets a hearing Feb. 7 on the plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction.
He noted that he's represented Navarro in the past, which is why she called him when the blast hit her home.
"She was hysterical about her house being severely damaged. The walls were shaking, and it felt the house was caving in," said Dick, the board president of the Harris County Department of Education. "I hope there are not as many explosions that continue to happen in Houston. I find it dangerous to the residents of Houston, and being an elected official, I find it disheartening we've had another explosion. I think the safety of the residents is priority No. 1
Click2Houston.com reported that two people died, one was hospitalized and at least 18 visited hospitals for treatment for injuries. Firefighters had searched about 190 homes and found significant damage, like homes moved off their foundations. Debris from the explosion spread at least a quarter-mile from the blast site, said the article.
Navarro claimed in the petition that the massive chemical explosion at the Houston-based manufacturing company significantly damaged her home. Windows were blown out, glass was strewn inside, doors were damaged, walls cracked and foundation fractured, among other things.
She alleged that Watson failed to heed the warnings from past explosions in Houston that have happened so many times that other industries, businesses and governmental agencies have put precautionary measures in place.
Navarro is suing the company for negligence, gross negligence, negligence per se, and for injunctive relief to require Watson to preserve evidence involved in the explosion. She seeks to recover economic and actual damages, as well as exemplary damages and attorney fees.
No one from Watson's media team immediately returned an email seeking comment.
|Read the lawsuit:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Lennox Hires 12-Year Company Veteran as CLO, Bucking Hire-From-Outside Trend
3 minute read
'Strong' Legal Theory or 'Oxymoron'? Experts Eye FTC Antitrust Suit Against Mattress Merger
5 minute read
This Judge Hoped to Be Reversed: Good News for Plaintiffs in Asbestos MDL
4 minute read
Senior American Airlines Attorney Lands Back at Kimberly-Clark, This Time as GC
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
