What It's Like to Try Your First Personal Injury Case
With the right amount of preparation, knowledge and understanding, you can take a lot of the scare, terror and fear out of trying your first case.
January 27, 2020 at 09:21 PM
6 minute read
There is nothing more daunting in the practice of law than attempting to try your first case. Most lawyers either don't try cases, are scared to try cases, or have tried and failed. Some people have been a victim of all three. However, with the right amount of preparation, knowledge and understanding, you can take a lot of the scare, terror and fear out of trying your first case.
|Facing the Unknown
Any good personal injury lawyer can take the unknowns out of the trial component. However, the part that some forget or fail to prepare for is obvious when they walk into the courtroom and don't understand specifically what to do. Judges have their pet peeves, and the last thing that any lawyer wants is to start out embarrassing himself or herself to the judge or the jury. Possible scenarios to avoid include:
- Failing to stand in the right place.
- Submitting an exhibit incorrectly.
- Asking a question out of turn.
- Not understanding that the judge does/doesn't allow backstriking when taking a turn.
Being Nervous Is Normal
According to the American Bar Association National Lawyer Population Survey, there were over 1.35 million active lawyers in the United States in 2019. If you're one of those attorneys, I can assure you that you aren't the only lawyer to encounter fear leading up to your first case. For someone like myself who has OCD, the uncertainty of not knowing where to sit, what courtroom decorum to borrow, and how the judge did a variety of different things made this an intimidating task. Fortunately, I found a book called "The First Trial (Where Do I Sit? What Do I Say?) in a Nutshell," by Steven H. Goldberg and Tracy Walters McCormack. It was helpful because it reminded me that there were other people like myself who were beginning to try cases that had the same fears.
|My First Trial (I Survived and You Will Too)
My first trial occurred when I was a third-year lawyer. It was a small judge trial, and although I had been in a courtroom on a number of different cases for various hearings, it was still a new territory for me. The most daunting aspect was not really understanding the appropriate protocol. Protocol deals with virtually everything they can't teach in law school and don't teach you during the practice of law either. At the time, I felt like I had a great deal of anxiety over not really understanding what I needed to do and where I needed to do it, unlike the legal aspects, of which I was much more confident.
|Preparing for Your First Case
- Watch your judge handle another trial.
The best advice I can give a personal injury lawyer ready to try their first case is to sit in the judge's courtroom and watch them handle a different trial. Doing this helps you know where to sit, where to ask questions from, how the judge wants to handle any sidebar conferences, and it allows you to better understand the judge who handles your client's trial.
- Do not be afraid to ask questions.
It's important to ask other lawyers for insights as well, whether it's specific to your judge or as general as how to try a case. A personal injury lawyer can look up most answers relative to the legal aspects of a trial, but can't get some of these answers without doing a little due diligence.
- Put together a checklist.
One thing that I have learned over the course of time is that it's a good idea to prepare a checklist for everything. I now have a set formula for how to address different themes with judges during pretrial conferences.
- Conferences are key.
If you don't have a pretrial conference for your case, my suggestion is that you request one and/or set a telephone status conference where you can ask the judge questions prior to trial so that you don't conduct an ex parte communication without the other side present.
- Etiquette, decorum and more.
Always remember that the judge's clerk is an excellent resource for anything regarding courtroom etiquette and decorum, and the judge's do's and don'ts. Many judges also have their own set of local rules, particularly in federal court. Those are always great resources as well.
- Each judge is different.
The most important thing you can do is try to learn about your judge and their preferences, whether it's with regard to admitting evidence or courtroom etiquette and decorum. You can't rely on a practice from a different judge to carry over to the judge you're in front of now, which makes soliciting information from the judge's clerk all that more important.
- Check out the courtroom beforehand.
At a minimum, I always go to the area where I'm trying a case a week in advance to ensure that I can get into the judge's courtroom, understand what type of technology they use and where it's set up, how to present exhibits and the way the judge runs their courtroom.
|Cover All Your Bases, and You Will Do Fine
In conclusion, ask your questions, speak to the court, talk to other personal injury lawyers, and look for any rules that you can find. Just remember, practice makes perfect, and the best thing you can do is always watch the court in session before your trial.
Patrick Daniel is the founder and principal of Patrick Daniel Law based in Houston. Visit www.PatrickDanielLaw.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Narcissist’s Dilemma: Balancing Power and Inadequacy in Family Law
8 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250