The Ranks of Texas Judges Grew More Diverse After 2018 Partisan Sweep
The statistics show that the biggest gains in judge diversity, which came after the 2018 partisan sweep when Democrats ousted Republican judges in Texas' major metro areas, happened at the trial-court level.
January 31, 2020 at 02:50 PM
6 minute read
Racial and ethnic diversity of the judges serving on Texas trial courts improved in the wake of the 2018 elections.
That election season, Democrats ousted Republicans from benches in the Lone Star State's major metro areas. While judicial watchers have grieved the loss of highly experienced judges, just because of the letter after their names on the ballot, statistics show that one consequence of the sweep was beneficial: greater diversity on the bench.
Some political observers have said that divisive politics at the national level could fuel another partisan sweep in Texas this year. Democratic gains that transformed the state's big cities in 2018 could spread to the suburbs surrounding Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston and Austin in November, posited the Texas Observer.
If so, could this bring even greater diversity to the Texas judiciary?
Although no one can answer that question yet, here's an overview of happened to the face of the judiciary in the wake of the 2018 sweep. Texas Lawyer analyzed data from the Texas Office of Court Administration to determine how the racial makeup of the bench changed. The judge count from Sept. 1, 2018, shows the makeup of the judiciary prior to the sweep, while the Sept. 1, 2019, numbers provide the count after the sweep.
The state's two high courts didn't change at all in terms of diversity, while the 14 intermediate appellate courts picked up a handful of diverse judges. The biggest gains in judge diversity happened at the trial-court level.
|District court diversity
The district courts in Texas saw big improvements in the ranks of African American, Hispanic or Latino and Asian or Pacific Islander judges in 2019.
Hover your cursor over the chart below to view the numbers. The yellow bar shows 2018 and the green bar shows 2019.
Source: Texas Office of Court Administration. Note: The figures represent the number of judges counted on Sept. 1, 2018, compared to Sept. 1, 2019, which are dates that correspond with the fiscal year for the state of Texas. Graphic: Angela Morris/ALM.
The number of African American district judges grew by 46% year over year. They made up 9% of the total number of district judges in 2019, compared with 6% in 2018.
The number of Asian or Pacific Islander judges grew from five to eight, a 60% increase, although they still make up a small percentage of district judges as a whole: Only 2% of the state's 462 district judges in 2019 identified as Asian or Pacific Islander, compared with 1% in 2018.
The number of Hispanic or Latino judges saw a 12% jump from 2018 to 2019. They make up a greater percentage of district judges as a whole: 18% of the district judges in 2019 were Hispanic or Latino, which is a 1-point increase compared with 2018.
As the ranks of minority judges grew, there was a corresponding dip in the numbers of white, non-Hispanic district judges in the state. The numbers of white judges decreased year over year by 3%, although they're still the majority of the bench. In 2019, 68% of district judges were white, compared with 72% in 2018.
|
Here's how the state's 462 district judges broke down by racial and ethnic makeup in 2019.
|
County Court-at-Law diversity
It appears that impressive gains in diversity also occurred at the county court-at-law level of the Texas judiciary.
Hover your cursor over the chart below to view the actual numbers. The purple bar shows 2018 and the pink bar shows 2019.
Source: Texas Office of Court Administration. Note: The figures represent the number of judges counted on Sept. 1, 2018, compared to Sept. 1, 2019, which are dates that correspond with the fiscal year for the state of Texas. Graphic: Angela Morris/ALM.
The data here is less reliable because of irregularities in reporting year over year. This is because in 2018, 20 of the state's 245 county court-at-law judges failed to report their race or ethnicity. The number of nonreporters dropped to just one of the 247 county court-at-law judges in 2019. There's no way to tell whether the 19 extra judges who decided to report their race and ethnicity may account for some of the gains in the diversity numbers from 2018 to 2019.
For example, the statistics show a whopping 213% increase in the number of African American county court-at-law judges from 2018 to 2019. This means the 25 African American judges in 2019 made up 10% of the total 247 county court-at-law judges. That would represent a significant 7-point gain compared with 2018, when African American judges accounted for just 3% of the total county court-at-law judges.
A significant year-over-year gain of 28% occurred in the number of Hispanic of Latino judges. They're starting to make up a good portion of the judiciary at this level: In 2019, 20% of the 247 county court-at-law judges were Hispanic or Latino, which is a 4-point increase compared to their rate of 16% in 2018.
The number of white county court-at-law judges dropped as the numbers of minority jurists climbed. There was a 3% year-over-year decrease in the number of white county court-at-law judges from 2018 to 2019. They're still the majority on this level of bench, though. In 2019, white judges accounted for 68% of the total number of county court-at-law judges, which is a 3-point decrease from 71% in 2018.
|
Here's how the state's 247 county court-at-law judges broke down by racial and ethnic makeup in 2019.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEven With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute read'Courts Do Get It Wrong': Legal Experts Discuss State-Law Certification Pros and Cons
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250