What's Happening in Austin? Court Statistics Show Litigation Spike in Texas Metro
Civil litigation increased in 2019 in all the other major metro areas, yet Harris County experienced a 9% drop in new civil cases. Meanwhile, Austin saw a 13% jump in that metric.
February 11, 2020 at 06:07 PM
5 minute read
Although it might seem odd, new cases added to district court dockets in 2019 increased at the largest clip in Austin, and decreased the most in Houston.
Texas Lawyer analyzed two years of court data from the Texas Office of Court Administration, and compared the numbers of new cases added in district courts among the Lone Star State's major metro areas—Houston, Dallas-Fort Worth, San Antonio and Austin.
As might be expected, Houston, the state's largest city, had the most cases added, compared with the other metros.
And Austin, the state's smallest major metro, had the least cases added. But its caseload grew the most.
Here are some of the biggest trends emerging when comparing 2019 with the previous year.
|Legislative impact
It might seem weird, but Austin pulled off a feat: Compared with other big Texas cities, Austin saw the largest gains in new cases added in 2019.
Travis County experienced a 6% gain in total new cases, even though all the other major metros saw decreases in this metric.
|
Total Cases Added to District Court Dockets in 2019
Civil cases in Travis County increased by 13% to land at just over 10,000, which is significant considering the statewide increase in this metric was just 1%. Dallas-Fort Worth and San Antonio also saw higher numbers of civil cases added, but their rate increased at a slower clip than Austin.
Travis County's local administrative judge, 261st District Judge Lora Livingston, said she has some guesses about why litigation increased in Austin in 2019.
"We had a legislative session in 2019 and that always increases our numbers to some extent," said Livingston, noting that Travis County, which houses state government, has exclusive jurisdiction over administrative law cases. "That might explain some of the increase."
|Plateau in Harris County
Although it may seem unusual for Texas' largest city, and the fourth most populated city in the nation, the data shows that Houston saw 8% fewer total cases added in 2019 than in 2018. That's compared with a 1% decrease statewide.
Civil cases increased in 2019 in all the other major metro areas, yet Harris County bucked that trend. It experienced a 9% drop from its 2018 number to land at 57,400 civil cases added in 2019.
|
Civil Cases Added to District Court Dockets
Clay Bowman, district courts administrator in Harris County, said that he's been tracking a spike in new cases since 2014, and he thinks the slight dip from 2018 to 2019 just shows that the county is reaching a plateau after its yearslong upward trend.
"This is coming at the end of four years of pretty continual increases in the numbers of cases filed in civil courts, actually a 30% increase from 2014 to 2018," explained Bowman.
David Slayton, administrative director of the Texas Office of Court Administration, didn't return a call or email seeking comment before deadline.
Harris County did follow a statewide trend of decreasing family cases, and to a larger extent than other cities. While the statewide drop in family law cases was just 5%, Harris County's metric decreased by 11% to 53,000 in 2019.
||
Family Law Cases Added to District Court Dockets in 2019
Just as family law cases decreased in Houston, Dallas-Fort Worth and San Antonio also saw drops here.
Austin was an outlier because it saw an 11% jump to nearly 15,000 family law cases added.
Incredible population growth in Central Texas and the Austin metro area is another driver of litigation upticks, added Livingston, the Travis County district judge.
"Particularly in family law cases, we are seeing pretty much a one-to-one correlation between population growth and the number of cases filed," she explained. "It's just true that when the population gets bigger, our caseload gets bigger, particularly when it comes to family law."
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTexas to Receive $21.6M From Publicis Health National $350M Settlement
3 minute readTexas Continues Crackdown on Deceptive Hotel Pricing With New Lawsuit
Google to Pay $8 Million Settlement to Texas Over Smartphone Advertising
'$10 Million? You Don't Blink at That Anymore': Are Lawyer Billboards Affecting Juries?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250