Houston, We Have an Opportunity: 4 Fast-Growing Civil Litigation Practice Areas
The amount of new civil litigation in Houston has jumped 23% over the past five years. Some practice areas saw double-digit gains from 2015 to 2019, while others had major declines. Texas Lawyer takes a look at the biggest opportunities for litigators.
February 13, 2020 at 11:33 AM
5 minute read
The amount of new civil litigation in Houston jumped 23% over the past five years.
Some practice areas like real property, motor vehicle and contract matters, saw double-digit gains from 2015 to 2019, while others like asbestos silica and other product liability cases saw major declines, according to data from the Texas Office of Court Administration.
Overall, there were 45,592 new civil cases filed in Harris County district courts in 2015, and the number increased to 55,985 in 2019, according to the data. The largest number came in 2018, when the county's district courts saw 61,440 new civil cases filed.
This means 2019's tally of nearly 56,000 represented a 9% drop from the previous year.
|
1.Real property is hot
But this 9% drop in civil litigation from 2018 to 2019 follows steady increases of 30% since 2014, according to Harris County District Courts Administrator Clay Bowman.
"Increases occurred over that period in all civil case types, but noticeably in real property cases," he wrote in an email.
The court data shows real property cases grew by 79% over the past five years, from 3,845 in 2015 to 6,888 cases in 2019.
A major contributing factor: Hurricane Harvey hit Houston in August 2017, and caused devastating property damage.
The statistics show the impact: in 2017 there were 5,445 cases, while in 2018 there were 7,925, which is a 46% year-over-year increase. The numbers began to drop in 2019, with 6,888 real property cases.
|
2. Motor vehicle cases rose 71%
The number of injury or damage cases involving motor vehicles has grown by 71% in Harris County within the five years, from 7,434 to 12,747 cases. Houston is not alone in this uptick. The Texas Judiciary's most recent annual report noted that statewide, there's been a 79% spike in motor vehicle cases in 10 years, from 34,000 in 2010 to 55,000 in 2019.
Read more:
Texas Courts Under Pressure With 9 Million Cases Filed Last Fiscal Year
|
3. Eminent domain litigation is booming
Another trend across Texas is increasing numbers of eminent domain cases: The statistical report tracked a 150% increase in five years statewide. This practice area is tiny in Houston, however, it's seen a great increase in five years from nine to 72 cases, which is a 700% increase.
Debt cases have also been on the rise across Texas, and Houston was no exception. The data shows that there were 4,508 debt cases in 2015, and the number rose to 6,246 five years later, which is a 39% increase.
|4. Contract disputes are on the rise
Other growth practice areas in Harris County included contract cases, which experienced a 41% increase in the past five years, and other injury or damage cases, which increased by 47% from 2015 to 2019.
|
Hover your cursor over this chart to view case numbers:
Source: Texas Office of Court Administration. Note: Numbers reflect new cases filed only, and not other ways cases reach the court's docket. Graphic: Angela Morris/ALM
|
Malpractice, tax litigation remained flat
Some practice areas have stayed relatively flat in the five-year time period, clocking increases ranging from just 1% to 5%. These include tax cases, which numbered about 9,700 in 2019; medical malpractice cases, of which there were 271 in 2019; other professional malpractice, which numbered 43; and other civil cases, which counted 3,691 cases.
|Product liability, asbestos suit decline
Meanwhile, Harris County saw declines in three practice areas. Asbestos and silica cases have dropped by 74%, from 187 cases in 2015 to 49 in 2019. Product liability cases are also on the decline: There were 102 cases in 2015, and just 68 in 2019, which is a 33% drop.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAkin, Baker Botts, Vinson & Elkins Are First Texas Big Law Firms to Match Milbank Bonuses
4 minute readAnticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readRevenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-68
- 2Friday Newspaper
- 3Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 4Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 5NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250