Texas Judge Blames Low Blood Sugar for Tirade Against Lawyer, Defendant
"This was wrong, and I am sorry. I have struggled over the past year over why I would act in such a manner, and have come to the conclusion that I was having 'low blood sugar' episode caused by my Type 1 Diabetes," wrote Comal County Court-at-Law No. 1 Judge Randy Gray of New Braunfels.
February 27, 2020 at 02:18 PM
4 minute read
Comal County Court-at-Law No. 1 Judge Randy Gray of New Braunfels received a public warning for an in-chambers tirade against a criminal-defense attorney, who had switched a client's case from the plea docket to the jury docket.
According to the public warning, released by the Texas Commission on Judicial Conduct, attorney Stefanie Collins was representing a man charged with possession of marijuana. The defendant was initially planning to enter a plea agreement, but later changed his mind. His attorney then appeared in Gray's court in March 2018, asking for the defendant's case to be placed on the jury docket.
Collins was told she needed to confer with Gray first. And back in the judge's chambers, Collins perceived that Gray was angry at her client for changing his mind and wanting a jury trial. The warning said that Collins' recalled Gray saying that he would allow the withdrawal of the plea, but that he was going to put the man in jail for "for wasting the court's time."
"Unless he gets a 'not guilty,' he should expect to go to jail for 10 days," the warning recounts about Gray's statement. "If the jury gives him 30 days, I will give him 40. If he pleads, he's going in for at least 10 days as a condition."
|'I have struggled over the past year'
Gray, who didn't return a call seeking comment, told his court coordinator to make a note to give the client 10 days in jail. And there is a handwritten note on a case reset form that says just that, the warning said.
When he responded to the complaint before the judicial conduct commission, Gray denied saying he'd give the man 10 days in jail, or telling his court coordinator to write a note. He denied knowing who wrote the note at all, and suggested it was another person.
Yet the coordinator confirmed it was her own handwriting, and she had written the note because the judge told her to do so, the warning said. Later, Gray told the commission that the coordinator's memory had changed. She gave a written statement to the commission saying she had written the note, but she wasn't sure she was supposed to write it, or why she had done it.
Later, though, Gray confessed that he behaved badly towards Collins by threatening to put a defendant in jail for asking for a jury trial, according to the warning.
"This was wrong, and I am sorry. I have struggled over the past year over why I would act in such a manner, and have come to the conclusion that I was having 'low blood sugar' episode caused by my Type 1 Diabetes. This is not an excuse, but rather, an explanation," Gray wrote to the commission, according to the warning.
When he appeared in person before the commission, Gray said his diabetes was inadequately controlled at the time, but since then, he's taken steps to manage his medical condition during times he's performing judicial duties.
The commission determined that Gray had violated judicial ethics rules that required him to comply with the law, maintain professional competence in the law, and perform his duties with no bias or prejudice. It also found he had violated provisions in the Texas Constitution that prohibit him from willful or persistent conduct inconsistent with a judge's duties, which include his lack of cooperation with the judicial conduct commission.
|Read the warning:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All11 Red State AGs Demand Damages in Antitrust Lawsuit Shaming ESG Climate Investors
3 minute readEven With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250