No Future for Men in Democratic Party? Female Dems Oust 8 Male Judges in Texas
"I don't see much of a future for men in the Democratic Party," said 179th District Judge Randy Roll of Houston, who was defeated Tuesday in Harris County's Democratic primary.
March 05, 2020 at 04:15 PM
5 minute read
Women lawyers who threw their hats in the ring to run for judge this primary season made a good bet.
As Texas voters in the Democratic Primary hit the polls Tuesday, it appears they picked female judge candidates.
Female Democratic challengers ousted five incumbent male judges in Houston, two in Austin and one in San Antonio. In the statewide races for the Texas Supreme Court and Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, women also beat their male primary opponents to win the Democratic nominations. This gender sweep was a Democratic Party phenomenon, and didn't happen in Republican primary judicial races.
"I don't see much of a future for men in the Democratic Party," said 179th District Judge Randy Roll of Houston, who was defeated Tuesday by Ana Martinez, a female challenger, in the Harris County's Democratic primary.
|New trend
Election experts told Texas Lawyer that the trend results from Democratic primaries drawing out more female voters, who in recent elections have expressed a preference for voting for women candidates. That type of gender preference comes out strongest in down-ballot races, like judicial elections, where voters have very little information about the candidates.
Democratic campaign consultant Jovita Pardo said 54% of the electorate in the Democratic primary are women and they are choosing to vote other women into office. When it's a choice between two female candidates, voters go for the woman of color, Pardo added. This is especially true in Texas' urban counties.
"As more and more women find their voices in this political system, we will continue to have more and more women challengers," said Pardo, owner of GNI Strategies in Austin. "I think this pattern is going to continue, especially in primaries, but we are hopeful even in November of 2020."
In Harris County, incumbent Judges Larry Weiman, Randy Roll, Daryl Moore, Steven Kirkland and George Powell lost their primaries to women candidates.
In Travis County, Judge David Wahlberg and Judge Tim Sulak were ousted, while in San Antonio, Judge Michael Mery lost his primary to a female challenger.
|Spontaneous decisions?
Judicial elections are very low-information elections, and it's surprising if more than 1-2% of the electorate knows any specific judicial candidate, said Josh Blank, research director of the Texas Politics Project at The University of Texas at Austin.
"Save for the few voters who take the time to educate themselves about the options all the way down the ballot, when they arrive, they are forced to make decisions based on whatever information is available to them. In this case, gender can be a signal to people," said Blank.
Women voters may think that female judges will be more liberal-minded than male judges, he guessed.
"It's probably a reflection of the political moment, also," Blank added. "The #MeToo movement is still an active discussion in Democratic Party politics, and that alone can be a reason for Democratic voters—male and female—to choose female candidates, absent any deep knowledge about these races, in order to rectify perceived gender imbalances."
Gender politics is more active in the Democratic than the Republican Party, which is why the gender sweep of the bench impacted Democratic incumbents more, he added.
Rather than being disappointed that a female challenger defeated him in Harris County's Democratic primary, Roll, one of the ousted Houston judges, said he feels relieved that he no longer has to fight against political pressure to keep his bench.
Roll said that Martinez, his opponent, has less trial experience than his seven years on the district court bench. But Roll said that he also feels his opponent is qualified for the position. Martinez didn't return a call or email seeking comment before deadline.
"I think she is very capable, even though she doesn't have a lot of experience," Roll said.
|'I worked really hard'
Houston attorney Natalia Cornelio defeated incumbent 351st District Judge George Powell and faces a Republican opponent in November. She said she values the choices and priorities that voters used in the ballot box.
"I worked really hard in our campaign and tried to connect with as many voters as possible about the issues in criminal justice and the courts," said Cornelio. "I heard from voters who I introduced myself to—not just women, but men—that they wanted to vote for women."
Picking a candidate based on gender alone doesn't always make the best choice, said Kathryn McNeil, a Democratic campaign consultant in Houston who works with judge candidates.
"That doesn't speak to whether or not they are qualified, and it doesn't speak to the fact that very qualified judges lost," said McNeil, owner of K Chace Consulting.
One gender sweep sparked worry in the Austin legal community. 345th District Judge Tim Sulak of Austin, who didn't return a call or email seeking comment, lost his seat when Travis County voters picked the female candidate, Madeleine Connor.
Connor, who didn't immediately return a call seeking comment, has been sanctioned by state and federal courts and declared a vexatious litigant because of a series of lawsuits she filed against board members of a utility district.
Pardo, the Austin campaign consultant, said that other Travis County judges worry about having Connor on the bench, and there's some talk of recruiting a write-in candidate to run against her in November.
She said, "At the end of the day, the way you will defeat Madeleine Connor is signing up a woman with a better name to run against her."
Related story:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEven With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute read'Courts Do Get It Wrong': Legal Experts Discuss State-Law Certification Pros and Cons
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How I Made Partner: 'Develop a Practice Area You Really Care About ,' Says Jennifer Gniady of Stradley Ronon
- 2Indian Billionaire Gautam Adani Indicted in Brooklyn for Alleged Orchestration of $250 Million Bribery Plot
- 3Eagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
- 4GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
- 5Legal Events for Georgia Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250