Coronavirus Courthouse Fallout: Expect More Video Conferences, Telephonic Hearings
What happens if a lawyer comes down with coronavirus right before a hearing or trial in court? Judges are urging attorneys to call in sick, and try using telephone or video teleconferencing hearings instead of making court appearances.
March 06, 2020 at 05:07 PM
5 minute read
As coronavirus outbreaks crop up across the country, some Texas judges are planning for what might happen if coronavirus infections derail hearings.
Some state judges in Houston are gearing to hold more video conferences and telephone hearings, in lieu of in-person court appearances. Meanwhile, Chief District Judge Rodney Gilstrap of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Sherman issued a standing order that tells lawyers to communicate with their opposing counsel to find alternatives to in-person hearings or depositions.
Another jurist, 125th District Judge Kyle Carter of Houston, advised lawyers to call the court's clerk, if they feel sick before a hearing. Carter, whose court only handles civil cases, said that he and other civil judges he knows would have no problem allowing an ill attorney to appear by telephone instead of coming to court.
But a telephone hearing is tricky when the court needs to take evidence in the form of documents or witness testimony, he noted. That's why he and fellow judges decided to work with the county's technology department to establish video teleconferencing functionality.
"I am trying to minimize [the] need for attorneys to be present in the courthouse. We are trying to get ahead of it, and set up this video conferencing method as soon as possible," Carter said. "These are things that coronavirus has kind of stepped up the importance of trying to achieve."
In Houston, 127th District Judge R.K. Sandill tested the new video teleconferencing system Thursday for a hearing and said it worked well.
Sandill said the Harris County district courts have already been using telephone and video teleconferencing more frequently for hearings, because of courthouse space limitations that arose from Hurricane Harvey. Those systems now will come in handy because of coronavirus, he said.
"We are not canceling oral hearings. We are just moving some hearings to video conference," Sandill said. "With the issues going on today, this alleviates some people's concerns. It allows lawyers to make hearings even though they are not feeling well."
Related story:
As Coronavirus Spreads, Legal Industry Shifts into Crisis Management Mode
Judges in federal courts in the Lone Star State are also taking coronavirus seriously.
Chief District Judge Lee Rosenthal of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas said that she's following coronavirus guidance that the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts sent to federal courts nationwide. That office urged courts to remain flexible with policies for court staff, and to encourage methods to reduce travel by out-of-town lawyers and witnesses, especially those coming from international destinations.
"I would urge lawyers to, when it is consistent with their internal requirements or health concerns, that if there are ways to avoid traveling to court, and instead rely on video conference technology, or different kinds of ways to present arguments, present information to the court, without physical presence, we ought to be taking advantage of those," she said.
A judge in Sherman's federal court went one step further.
Gilstrap, who didn't return a call seeking comment, issued a standing order that outlines what lawyers must do if they, their clients, or a witness in a case is sick with coronavirus, or has come into contact with someone who is.
The court has a duty to ensure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of proceedings, but it also needed to protect parties, court staff, witnesses and lawyers who appear in court, according to the order.
Lawyers should err on the side of caution, the order said. Gilstrap ordered attorneys to promptly notify their opposing counsel, if there's any suspicion that anyone in the case has coronavirus or was exposed to it.
The order noted that the U.S. government has issued travel prohibitions and travel warnings against those countries that are highly impacted by coronavirus. The order said that lawyers for both sides of cases must keep in contact regarding whether a scheduled hearing or trial would require international travel by a party, attorney, or witness which would violate the government's travel restrictions.
When a lawyer does notify his or her opposing counsel of this type of coronavirus threat, the order said the attorneys must discuss how to conduct the hearing, trial, or deposition in a way that is safe and complies with the U.S. government's travel restrictions. For example, they might be able to do a video conference instead, or simply delay the proceeding, according to the order. In some situations, the lawyer who is sick may be able to send a replacement, or if possible, a sick witness or corporate representative could be swapped for an alternative person.
The order also explained how lawyers need to notify the court about what happened, and if needed, ask the court to resolve any disagreements that occur.
The goal is to take the threat seriously, while also ensuring the court's continue to function.
Rosenthal, the Houston federal judge, said, "We intend to do our work, and to be prudent and careful, but to get the work done."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readSpecial Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
4 minute read'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250