Coronavirus Courthouse Fallout: Expect More Video Conferences, Telephonic Hearings
What happens if a lawyer comes down with coronavirus right before a hearing or trial in court? Judges are urging attorneys to call in sick, and try using telephone or video teleconferencing hearings instead of making court appearances.
March 06, 2020 at 05:07 PM
5 minute read
As coronavirus outbreaks crop up across the country, some Texas judges are planning for what might happen if coronavirus infections derail hearings.
Some state judges in Houston are gearing to hold more video conferences and telephone hearings, in lieu of in-person court appearances. Meanwhile, Chief District Judge Rodney Gilstrap of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Sherman issued a standing order that tells lawyers to communicate with their opposing counsel to find alternatives to in-person hearings or depositions.
Another jurist, 125th District Judge Kyle Carter of Houston, advised lawyers to call the court's clerk, if they feel sick before a hearing. Carter, whose court only handles civil cases, said that he and other civil judges he knows would have no problem allowing an ill attorney to appear by telephone instead of coming to court.
But a telephone hearing is tricky when the court needs to take evidence in the form of documents or witness testimony, he noted. That's why he and fellow judges decided to work with the county's technology department to establish video teleconferencing functionality.
"I am trying to minimize [the] need for attorneys to be present in the courthouse. We are trying to get ahead of it, and set up this video conferencing method as soon as possible," Carter said. "These are things that coronavirus has kind of stepped up the importance of trying to achieve."
In Houston, 127th District Judge R.K. Sandill tested the new video teleconferencing system Thursday for a hearing and said it worked well.
Sandill said the Harris County district courts have already been using telephone and video teleconferencing more frequently for hearings, because of courthouse space limitations that arose from Hurricane Harvey. Those systems now will come in handy because of coronavirus, he said.
"We are not canceling oral hearings. We are just moving some hearings to video conference," Sandill said. "With the issues going on today, this alleviates some people's concerns. It allows lawyers to make hearings even though they are not feeling well."
Related story:
As Coronavirus Spreads, Legal Industry Shifts into Crisis Management Mode
Judges in federal courts in the Lone Star State are also taking coronavirus seriously.
Chief District Judge Lee Rosenthal of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas said that she's following coronavirus guidance that the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts sent to federal courts nationwide. That office urged courts to remain flexible with policies for court staff, and to encourage methods to reduce travel by out-of-town lawyers and witnesses, especially those coming from international destinations.
"I would urge lawyers to, when it is consistent with their internal requirements or health concerns, that if there are ways to avoid traveling to court, and instead rely on video conference technology, or different kinds of ways to present arguments, present information to the court, without physical presence, we ought to be taking advantage of those," she said.
A judge in Sherman's federal court went one step further.
Gilstrap, who didn't return a call seeking comment, issued a standing order that outlines what lawyers must do if they, their clients, or a witness in a case is sick with coronavirus, or has come into contact with someone who is.
The court has a duty to ensure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of proceedings, but it also needed to protect parties, court staff, witnesses and lawyers who appear in court, according to the order.
Lawyers should err on the side of caution, the order said. Gilstrap ordered attorneys to promptly notify their opposing counsel, if there's any suspicion that anyone in the case has coronavirus or was exposed to it.
The order noted that the U.S. government has issued travel prohibitions and travel warnings against those countries that are highly impacted by coronavirus. The order said that lawyers for both sides of cases must keep in contact regarding whether a scheduled hearing or trial would require international travel by a party, attorney, or witness which would violate the government's travel restrictions.
When a lawyer does notify his or her opposing counsel of this type of coronavirus threat, the order said the attorneys must discuss how to conduct the hearing, trial, or deposition in a way that is safe and complies with the U.S. government's travel restrictions. For example, they might be able to do a video conference instead, or simply delay the proceeding, according to the order. In some situations, the lawyer who is sick may be able to send a replacement, or if possible, a sick witness or corporate representative could be swapped for an alternative person.
The order also explained how lawyers need to notify the court about what happened, and if needed, ask the court to resolve any disagreements that occur.
The goal is to take the threat seriously, while also ensuring the court's continue to function.
Rosenthal, the Houston federal judge, said, "We intend to do our work, and to be prudent and careful, but to get the work done."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readOvertime Rewind: Texas Court Ruling Unravels FLSA Salary Level Increases
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settle Defamation Lawsuit Before Depositions
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250