A proposed change in the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct would lift a prohibition against the use of trade names for law firms, a divisive issue in Texas and elsewhere that has led to free speech suits in several states.

Although it would eliminate the blanket Texas prohibition on trade names, the proposed revision of Rule 7.01 would continue to prohibit lawyers from making or sponsoring false or misleading statements about the qualifications or services of a lawyer or firm.

State Bar of Texas President Randall Sorrels said the package of rule changes, including the trade name rule, is likely to go to a vote of members of the State Bar of Texas sometime next spring. Sorrels said that if the membership approves the rule changes, it would moot the lawsuit filed against Texas over the blanket prohibition against the use of trade names.

On Jan. 23, a Utah firm known as LawHQ filed lawsuits against Texas and eight other states that target bar officials, alleging that wholesale prohibitions on the use of trade names for firms is unconstitutional and should be abolished.

The Texas suit was filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas and names Seana Willing, the Texas chief disciplinary counsel, as the defendant. Willing has not filed an answer.

Rebecca Evans, general counsel of LawHQ in Salt Lake City, Utah, did not immediately respond to a call seeking comment.

The proposed revisions to Rule VII, which regulates communications lawyers make to obtain professional employment, have been years in the making.

The Texas Committee on Disciplinary Rules and Referenda (CDRR) has been working on a package of proposed changes to Rule VII since 2018, and it recently sent a recommendation to the State Bar of Texas Board of Directors that included the rule that maintained the prohibition against the use of trade names.

However, at a meeting Jan. 24, the bar board voted to return the proposal to the committee for additional consideration, specifically the possibility of amending the proposed rules to "be consistent" with the majority of other states in connection with trade names.

At its Feb. 5 meeting, the committee revised its proposal for Rule 7.07 to eliminate the ban on trade names, and published the proposed in the March Texas Bar Journal.

A public hearing on the proposed rule changes is scheduled for April 7 and the committee is expected to vote in May whether to submit the recommendation to the bar board.

The chair of the CDRR, Lewis Kinard, who is also general counsel of the American Heart Association in Dallas, did not immediately return a telephone message.

Sorrels, a partner in Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto, Aziz & Stogner in Houston, said Texas lawyers have strong feelings on both sides of the issue of trade names. That was apparent in public comments collected by the CDRR on the proposed rule changes.

Christopher Gagne, a lawyer in Leander, which is located near Austin, commented in writing that he wholeheartedly agrees with the proposed change to eliminate the ban on law firm trade names.

"It is long overdue to move Texas into conformity with other jurisdictions that permit the use of trade names for law firms," Gagne wrote.

On the other side, Houston lawyer Michael Sanders, of Sanders LLP, wrote that the use of trade names "cheapens the profession" and he is opposed.

In an interview on Friday, Sanders said the change will not benefit the public.

"You are going to see a lot of divorce, personal injury and criminal defense attorneys using it, and people need to be picking a lawyer based on something other than who has the best-sounding trade name," he said.

Read More

Texas Among Nine State Bars Facing Free Speech Suits Over Law Firm Name Rules