State Bar of Texas Issues Coronavirus Response Plan
Any attorney who doesn't want to attend live TexasBarCLE events will have free access to online videos of the programs.
March 10, 2020 at 05:58 PM
3 minute read
Attorneys anxious about contracting coronavirus at social gatherings have the option of getting continuing legal education through online videos, or canceling their registrations, under new guidelines that the State Bar of Texas issued in response to the pandemic.
In a notice to lawyers on Tuesday, State Bar Executive Director Trey Apffel wrote that while all bar offices and service remain operational, and TexasBarCLE events are proceeding as planned, that the bar has chosen to implement safeguards because of the COVID-19 outbreak.
The bar is following Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines to keep everyone healthy and safe, wrote Apffel, who didn't immediately return a call seeking comment.
Any attorney who doesn't want to attend live TexasBarCLE events will have free access to online videos of the programs, said the notice. Lawyers may also cancel their registrations and get a refund. Those who still go to live events should read about the CDC's advice about hand-washing, not touching the face, covering coughs and sneezes, and keeping a distance between people, the notice said.
The bar is encouraging its standing committees and legal sections to limit in-person meetings, and conduct business remotely instead. Any State Bar employee or lawyer who is sick should stay home, said the notice.
The Texas Law Center in Austin, where the bar is headquartered, will be using enhanced disinfection and health protocols, as will the regional offices of the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel spread across Texas, the notice said.
|Attorneys for quarantine cases
Apffel wrote that the Texas Office of Court Administration is seeking the names and contact information of Texas attorneys who are willing to represent coronavirus patients who go through an involuntary quarantine proceeding under state law.
Texas Lawyer reported on March 5 that top judicial leaders had asked Texas' regional presiding judges to appoint two district judges in each region to be on-call for involuntary quarantine hearings. This legal proceeding only comes into play if people with coronavirus refuse to self-quarantine.
In that situation, a county attorney, district attorney or the attorney general's office can seek an ex parte emergency court order to involuntarily quarantine patients.
The very next day, a court must hold a full due-process hearing, and the coronavirus patients would be allowed to have a court-appointed attorney, if they can't afford to hire their own attorney.
Apffel wrote that any lawyer who is willing to accept court appointments to represent the patients in these cases should complete a form to provide their name and contact information.
Related story:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEven With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute read'Courts Do Get It Wrong': Legal Experts Discuss State-Law Certification Pros and Cons
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3Mass. Judge Declares Mistrial in Talc Trial: 'Court Can't Accommodate This Case'
- 4It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
- 5Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250