Brace Yourself for Breach-of-Contract Lawsuits Due to Coronavirus, Attorneys Say
Disputes are surfacing as U.S. companies get notices that their China-based vendors can't honor contracts, because of business disruptions from coronavirus and quarantines.
March 11, 2020 at 01:10 PM
3 minute read
As the coronavirus continues disrupting global supply chains, hitting businesses' bottom lines hard enough to hurt, attorneys on the front line expect litigation to follow.
Lawyers expect to see breach-of-contract lawsuits between companies facing major supply-chain disruptions. Disputes are already surfacing as U.S. companies get notices that their China-based vendors of parts or materials can't honor contracts because of the "force majeure" event—meaning unforeseen, uncontrollable circumstances—brought about by coronavirus and mass quarantines.
The potential scope of future litigation is enormous.
"As of March 3, China issued 4,811 force majeure certificates," said Joshua Sandler, partner at Lynn Pinker Cox & Hurst in Dallas, who added that the total value is $53.79 billion. "The impact, then, on nearly every U.S. supply chain is going to be severe. It could mean every U.S. supply chain could come to a halt, if these Chinese partners or companies stop, or try to excuse their nonperformance of a contract."
Force majeure
When companies enter contracts with each other, it's very common to include a force majeure clause, explained said Nicholas J. Ellis, senior counsel in Foley & Lardner in Detroit. If one of those companies sues the other, then the defendant can invoke the force majeure clause to avoid liability for breach of contract. Some of these provisions are pretty loosely worded, and may encompass coronavirus disruptions, but others are narrowly written and coronavirus won't apply.
"We do a lot of supply-chain work, and we are seeing a lot of concern over this issue, and we are seeing a lot of force-majeure events come up," Ellis said.
But just because one company declares a force majeure event, lawyers say that doesn't mean litigation is imminent.
Ellis said that at this point, most parties just want to manage the problem and get their operations back on line. However, at some point, companies will begin asking who is responsible for the costs. If they can't agree on a resolution, that's when they file lawsuits.
Even if two companies are regular partners and highly motivated to work out disputes, such cooperation could break down if the business disruptions are too great for one of the companies to handle.
Neel Lane, partner at Norton Rose Fulbright in San Antonio, said that if a company files for bankruptcy, the bankruptcy court appoints a trustee or debtor-in-possession to manage the company's assets. That person will not care about the bankrupt company's relationship with its vendor. The trustee, whose main job is recovering as many assets as possible in the bankruptcy, will not hesitate to sue the vendor, said Neel.
Sandler, the Dallas commercial litigator, added that when a company gets sued for breaching a contract, it may have to defend itself by bringing its suppliers into the suit.
For example, imagine a U.S. smartphone company that has contracted with a Chinese plant to assemble its devices. If coronavirus has shut down the Chinese facility, so that it's not making any smartphones, that may be a valid defense to breaching its contract. The smartphone company may want to keep its business relationship with the Chinese facility. However, the U.S. smartphone company probably has other contracts to provide devices to retail stores. What happens if one retail store sues the smartphone company for failing to live up to its contract?
Sandler noted, "It has repercussions, like the ripples of a pond."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLennox Hires 12-Year Company Veteran as CLO, Bucking Hire-From-Outside Trend
3 minute read'Strong' Legal Theory or 'Oxymoron'? Experts Eye FTC Antitrust Suit Against Mattress Merger
5 minute readThis Judge Hoped to Be Reversed: Good News for Plaintiffs in Asbestos MDL
4 minute readSenior American Airlines Attorney Lands Back at Kimberly-Clark, This Time as GC
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Treasury GC Returns to Davis Polk to Co-Chair White-Collar Defense and Investigations Practice
- 2Decision of the Day: JFK to Paris Stowaway's Bail Revocation Explained
- 3Doug Emhoff, Husband of Former VP Harris, Lands at Willkie
- 4LexisNexis Announces Public Availability of Personalized AI Assistant Protégé
- 5Some Thoughts on What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250