Amid Energy Investment Slowdown, Thompson & Knight Feels Revenue, Profit Pinch in 2019
Bankruptcy is one practice that started slow at Texas firm Thompson & Knight in 2019, then picked up as the year went on.
March 17, 2020 at 03:51 PM
4 minute read
Coming off a record 2018, Thompson & Knight saw revenue slip 3.8% in 2019 thanks to a slow start in intellectual property and bankruptcy, and a midyear decline in capital investment in the energy sector.
Revenue per lawyer at the Dallas-based firm was $784,000 in 2019, down 2.2% when compared with $802,000 the year before, as lawyer head count dropped by 1.4%. Gross revenue totaled $217.9 million, compared with $226.5 million in 2018.
Profits per equity partner came in at $1.07 million, down 3.7% from $1.11 million in 2018. Net income was $90.6 million, a decline of 4.9% from $95.3 million the prior year.
Mark Sloan, managing partner of Thompson & Knight, said 2019 was a "little bit of a back-off" from last year, when gross revenue grew by 6.8% and PEP improved by a hefty 15.9%.
He said most of the firm's practices stayed busy during the first quarter, but intellectual property work was slow because a large lawsuit settled in January. Bankruptcy also took off slowly, although it picked up considerably by the third quarter, he said.
By May and June, the firm's transactional side started seeing the effects of the lack of capital investment in the energy market. On the plus side, Sloan said the trial group and real estate were busy all year, along with health care and tax controversy.
Significant transactions in 2019 included representing EnCap Investments in the sale of its foreign investments in Sierra Oil & Gas to a subsidiary of DEA AG; representing Haggar Clothing Co. and Yue Yuen Industrial as Haggar was acquired by Randa Accessories; representing Frog Scooters in launching its global operations; and representing US Bank National Association in three note offerings totaling $1.85 billion.
Collections also slowed in 2019, Sloan said, which was related in part to the energy industry. But because of that, the firm started the year sitting on "pretty high" inventory and accounts receivable, and he said collections improved a bit after the first of the year.
The firm raised billing rates at the beginning of 2019 as part of a normal annual review to fit the market. "We aren't the highest-cost provider. We aren't the lowest-cost provider," Sloan said.
Hiring during 2019 was largely focused in Houston, but Sloan said the firm also added some lawyers in Dallas. Laterals included project finance partner George Humphrey and tax partner Louis Jenull in Houston.
This year, the firm is open to "good opportunities" in Dallas and Houston, and also looking to expand in New York, a location "not as large as we want it to be," Sloan said. Like other Texas firms, Thompson & Knight is aiming to hire more bankruptcy and restructuring lawyers, he said, particularly as energy companies feel the effects of a downturn in oil prices.
"The energy industry is not in favor right now by investors and I think obviously what's happening with energy prices right now, there will be some shakeout," he said.
Head count in 2019 was 278, down slightly from 282 in 2018, but the firm's nonequity partner count dipped to 50 from 60 the year before while the firm had 85 equity partners, only one less than the prior year.
Sloan said the drop in nonequity partners is due to some retirements and departures, but the firm is nevertheless focused on increasing its leverage by adding associates.
"Long term, it makes sense to have fewer income partners and more associates in terms of our leverage model. It's happening naturally," he said.
The firm closed its 7-year-old Los Angeles office in 2019. "Frankly, it wasn't strategic," Sloan said. He said the firm is not seriously considering any new locations this year.
2020 started out a bit above budget, Sloan said, noting that uncertainty in energy markets led the firm to budget conservatively for the year. Real estate continues to be busy, and IP, bankruptcy and technology are also showing strength, he said. But much remains to be seen in the coming months.
"This coronavirus thing is the big unknown. Nobody knows how long it's going to impact things," Sloan said.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDLA Piper Sued by 2 Houston Companies, Alleging a 'Fake Lawyer' Represented Them in Argentina
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250