DOJ, FTC Bend Antitrust Rules to Let Companies Collaborate on Fighting COVID-19
The agencies are still enforcing antitrust laws, Morrison & Foerster partner David Meyer said. He added, "I think each situation still needs to be evaluated by counsel. These are good tools to use, but they are not a blank check."
March 25, 2020 at 05:33 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
With two key U.S. antitrust agencies offering their blessing, a group of at least 19 organizations have agreed to form an unprecedented coalition to meet the challenges wrought by the coronavirus.
The COVID-19 Healthcare Coalition includes big tech companies like Microsoft Corp. and Amazon Web Services, health care companies like the Mayo Clinic and HCA Healthcare, electronic medical record companies, universities and others who are coordinating U.S. pandemic response efforts using data and analytics.
In a statement the group said, "Our mission is to save lives by providing real-time learning to preserve health care delivery and protect populations. We're bringing together the best, brightest minds, assets and insights from across private industry to coordinate a response."
Sometimes that means companies that normally compete against each other might be collaborating on projects.
The U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission on Tuesday issued a joint statement recognizing the need for "unprecedented cooperation between federal, state and local governments and among private businesses to protect Americans' health and safety" during the pandemic.
The statement details an expedited, seven-day antitrust procedure and provides guidance to collaborating businesses.
"There are many ways firms, including competitors, can engage in procompetitive collaboration that does not violate the antitrust laws," the agencies said in the joint statement.
While the U.S. agencies agreed to consider "exigent circumstances" during the health crisis, they also stressed that ordinary antitrust violations, such as price fixing or market allocation, would still be prosecuted.
Attorney David Meyer, a partner at Morrison & Foerster's Washington, D.C., office, told Corporate Counsel on Wednesday that while this is good news for companies that want to collaborate to produce needed goods faster or distribute them more efficiently, he would urge some caution.
"I think each situation still needs to be evaluated by counsel," he said. "These are good tools to use, but they are not a blank check."
It was not immediately known if the coalition had gone through any antitrust process, and attempts to reach some coalition leaders for comment were not immediately successful.
Under the health care coalition's stated principles, "Everyone participates for the benefit of the country only—with open cooperation and sharing. Nobody is paid for coalition work, without exception."
The coalition was formed by leaders from the Mayo Clinic, health care consultants Leavitt Partners, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
It is being coordinated by The MITRE Corp., a nonprofit that manages federally funded research and development centers supporting several U.S. government agencies.
"Applying real-time data analytics and best practice guidance to a pandemic can flatten the curve of infection and change its course, as seen with Ebola and H1N1," said Dr. Jay Schnitzer, MITRE's chief technology and medical officer, in an article for Healthcare IT News.
"The business and research communities have mobilized to address COVID-19 and give this data analysis to the health care system leaders and public health officials to make evidence-based decisions that can save lives," he also said.
The coalition is soliciting other organizations to join its ranks. Its web page says it needs help with "information and/or data, analytics and actions."
Its 19 partners so far are Amazon Web Services, Arcadia.io, athenahealth Inc., Buoy Health Inc., CommonWell Health Alliance, Epic Systems Corp., HCA Healthcare, Intermountain Healthcare, Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings, Leavitt Partners, MassChallenge Inc., Mayo Clinic, Microsoft Corp., MITRE Corp., nference Inc., Oura, Rush University System for Health, Salesforce.com Inc. and the University of California Health System.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAG in Texas Is Nation's First to Bring Gen AI Enforcement Action in Health Care
5 minute readHarris County Jury Returns $25.6M Verdict Over Noncompete Agreement
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250